ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gtld-council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gtld-council] Updated work schedule: conference calls 6 & 20

  • To: gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [gtld-council] Updated work schedule: conference calls 6 & 20
  • From: Liz Williams <liz.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 16:42:50 +0200

Many thanks Chuck

Unless I hear otherwise from other members of the group, I won't schedule a call for Recommendation 20.

Liz
.....................................................

Liz Williams
Senior Policy Counselor
ICANN - Brussels
+32 2 234 7874 tel
+32 2 234 7848 fax
+32 497 07 4243 mob




On 16 Jul 2007, at 16:39, Gomes, Chuck wrote:

As I said on Friday's call, I don't see any value in the Rec. 20 call
meeting again.  Working it on the full committee list should suffice.

Chuck Gomes

"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this message in error, please notify sender
immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission."


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Liz Williams
Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2007 1:58 PM
To: Avri Doria
Cc: gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gtld-council] Updated work schedule: conference
calls 6 & 20

Hello everyone

The option is open to the Rec 20 small group if they need it.

Liz
.....................................................

Liz Williams
Senior Policy Counselor
ICANN - Brussels
+32 2 234 7874 tel
+32 2 234 7848 fax
+32 497 07 4243 mob




On 15 Jul 2007, at 19:34, Avri Doria wrote:

Hi,

While, as Chuck indicated in his note, there had been
agreement on the
discussion group for #6 meeting again, there had been not been such
agreement for #20.

I see no problem with the #20 discussion group meeting if they feel
there is something to be gained by doing so.  Perhaps some on list
conversation will indicate whether there is any value in
such a call.

thanks for setting them up.

a.



On 15 jul 2007, at 13.23, Liz Williams wrote:

Hello everyone

It seems that a set of conference calls to deal with outstanding
issues on recommendation 6 & 20 would be useful.  Please see
suggested times below and please refer to my previous
email for the
start point of those discussions.  I can co-ordinate both calls if
necessary but would ask that a member of each group report to the
Committee meeting on Thursday 19 July.

Given the current work schedule of other GNSO calls, I suggest two
sequential calls on Wed 18 July

Recommendation 6 small group:  15:00 UTC (08:00 LA/San Francisco,
11:00 EDT/Washington DC, 12:00 Buenos Aires, 17:00 CEST/Brussels/
Oslo, 01:00 Melbourne, next day.)

Recommendation 20 small group:  16:30 UTC (09:30 LA/San Francisco,
12:30 EDT/Washington DC, 13:30 Buenos Aires, 18:30 CEST/Brussels/
Oslo)

I hope that this will suit the majority -- it is almost
impossible to
schedule something that is perfect but this should suit the main
protagonists for each group.

I will proceed with having the GNSO Secretariat send out
call details
ASAP.

Kind regards.

Liz


.....................................................

Liz Williams
Senior Policy Counselor
ICANN - Brussels
+32 2 234 7874 tel
+32 2 234 7848 fax
+32 497 07 4243 mob











<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy