Re: [gtld-council] Updated recommendation table -

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

I thought that this phrase had been eliminated because the content  
was already covered below.  I deleted that sentence as it was listed  
as one of the options under the process heading.
Liz, can you confirm from your notes?

Otherwise, we will need to go back to the recording to determine what  
the decision was.
Thanks for bringing this up.

a.


On 20 jul 2007, at 13.35, Gomes, Chuck wrote:

> The objector must
> provide verifiable evidence that it is an established institution  
> of the
> community and that there will be detriment to the legitimate rights or
> interests of the objecting community.