Re: [gtld-council] Updated recommendation table - new IGP (h)

["Anthony Harris" <harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Sounds OK with me

Tony Harris

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>; 
<gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2007 6:40 PM
Subject: RE: [gtld-council] Updated recommendation table - new IGP (h)


> Thanks Philip.
>
> The objector may not have a basis for providing evidence from all of the
> 'community' or from 'users' in general so I think we should narrow the
> wording somewhat.  Also, some members of the RyC like the word
> 'verifiable' so I added it back in.  How about the following?
>
> "h) detriment
> Verifiable evidence must be provided of detriment to the legitimate
> rights or interests of that portion of the community represented by the
> objector."
>
> Chuck Gomes
>
> "This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
> confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
> unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If
> you have received this message in error, please notify sender
> immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission."
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:owner-gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> > Philip Sheppard
> > Sent: Monday, July 23, 2007 11:00 AM
> > To: gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [gtld-council] Updated recommendation table - new IGP (h)
> >
> >
> > Chuck,
> > I see your objective now.
> > It's a good point.
> >
> > Current wording of IGp (h) is:
> > h) detriment
> > Evidence of detriment to the community or to users more
> > widely must be provided.
> >
> > I agree lets change (as Chuck suggests) to:
> > h) detriment
> > Evidence of detriment to the legitimate rights or interests,
> > of the community or to users more widely, must be provided.
> >
> > Philip