ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gtld-council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gtld-council] new TLDs Final Report: Last Call

  • To: "Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@xxxxxxx>, "Liz Williams" <liz.williams@xxxxxxxxx>, <gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gtld-council] new TLDs Final Report: Last Call
  • From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 14:14:02 -0400

At this stage, it might be better not to make changes that are more
substantial and might require additional confirmation with the full
committee.  It seems to me that the wording that Liz included is
flexible enough that it would allow implementation details that
accomplish what your recommended rewording would do.

Chuck Gomes
 
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this message in error, please notify sender
immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission." 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rosette, Kristina [mailto:krosette@xxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 11:29 AM
> To: Gomes, Chuck; Liz Williams; gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [gtld-council] new TLDs Final Report: Last Call
> 
> I was trying to accomplish something more - separating out 
> who investigates claims of support.  Evaluators in string contention
> situations, and expert panels in objection situations.   
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 10:21 AM
> To: Rosette, Kristina; Liz Williams; gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [gtld-council] new TLDs Final Report: Last Call
> 
> It does appear to me that an edit is needed because the last 
> sentence in IG-G still reads like there is only one exception 
> and we now have two.
> Couldn't the last sentence be revised as simply as this: 
> "Under these exceptions, Staff Evaluators will devise 
> criteria and procedures to investigate the claim."  All I did 
> was replace 'this exception' with 'these exceptions'.
> 
> Kristina - were you trying to accomplish more than this?  If so, what?
> 
> Chuck Gomes
>  
> "This message is intended for the use of the individual or 
> entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information 
> that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure 
> under applicable law. Any unauthorized use, distribution, or 
> disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
> message in error, please notify sender immediately and 
> destroy/delete the original transmission." 
>  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> > [mailto:owner-gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rosette, 
> > Kristina
> > Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 9:58 AM
> > To: Liz Williams; gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: RE: [gtld-council] new TLDs Final Report: Last Call
> > 
> > A suggested amendment to IG G.  I propose that we amend the last 
> > sentence ("Under this exception, Staff Evaluators will 
> devise criteria
> 
> > and procedures to investigate the claim.") to read:
> > 
> > Under exception (i), Staff Evaluators will devise criteria and 
> > procedures to investigate the claim.  Under exception (ii), 
> an expert 
> > panel will apply the process, guidelines, and definitions 
> set forth in
> 
> > IG P.
> > 
> > This amendment makes explicit the limitation of the role of 
> evaluators
> 
> > and incorporates the role of an expert panel in those circumstances 
> > where a formal objection has been raised.
> > 
> > As amended, IG G would now read:
> > 
> > Where an applicant lays any claim that the TLD is intended 
> to support 
> > a particular community such as a sponsored TLD, or any other TLD 
> > intended for a specified community, that claim will be 
> taken on trust 
> > with the following exceptions:
> > (i)  the claim relates to a string that is also subject to another 
> > application and the claim to support a community is being 
> used to gain
> 
> > priority for the application; and
> > (ii) a formal objection process is initiated.
> > Under exception (i), Staff Evaluators will devise criteria and 
> > procedures to investigate the claim.  Under exception (ii), 
> an expert 
> > panel will apply the process, guidelines, and definitions 
> set forth in
> 
> > IG P and .
> > 
> > (I did not include in the last sentence a reference to rules, etc. 
> > that will be developed for the panel because it's not clear 
> to me what
> 
> > exactly will be developed and by whom.  I'm amenable to an 
> appropriate
> > amendment.)
> > 
> > Kristina
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> > [mailto:owner-gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Liz Williams
> > Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 3:56 AM
> > To: gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [gtld-council] new TLDs Final Report: Last Call
> > 
> > Good morning everyone
> > 
> > This is a last call for text, alterations and amendments 
> before I send
> 
> > out the updated version of the Final Report.
> > 
> > Kind regards.
> > 
> > Liz
> > .....................................................
> > 
> > Liz Williams
> > Senior Policy Counselor
> > ICANN - Brussels
> > +32 2 234 7874 tel
> > +32 2 234 7848 fax
> > +32 497 07 4243 mob
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy