<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[no subject]
- To: icm-options-report@xxxxxxxxx
- From: "JeffPalmer.net" <mejpalmer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 08:14:34 -0700 (PDT)
I Jeff Palmer.
As an affiliate program for the adult entertainment industry, my
business' foundation is internet based. If ICM's application were
granted and a .XXX sTLD were to be created it would negatively impact
my business. Also it would put ICANN in the position of creating an
entity to impose regulations and policy for the adult entertainment
community-a situation that could easily stifle what is now a robust
adult entertainment internet presence.
I do not support the creation of a .XXX sTLD and believe
that the ICANN Board was well within its rights to deny ICM's
application in the 2007 Board meeting in Lisbon.
It
is imperative that ICANN consider the widespread opposition from the
adult entertainment community to a .XXX sTLD as it makes its decision.
For that reason, I support Option # 3 of the March 26, 2010 process
options submitted by ICANN for public comment.
jeff palmer.
JeffPalmer.NET
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|