<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [jig] Issue with 3D
- To: "'Avri Doria'" <avri@xxxxxxx>, "'jig'" <jig@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [jig] Issue with 3D
- From: "Edmon Chung" <edmon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 22:49:15 +0800
Ok. Makes sense.
Edmon
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-jig@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-jig@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri
> Doria
> Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 8:44 PM
> To: jig
> Subject: Re: [jig] Issue with 3D
>
>
>
> On 11 Mar 2013, at 02:01, Edmon Chung wrote:
>
> > Maybe we should use .icann for icann :-D
>
>
> I thought of that.
>
> Can you imagine the fury had ICANN tried?
>
> But more importantly, when did we gain universal acceptance of TLDs longer
> than 3 letters.
>
> And of course that is part of the IDN point of concern. So I endorse the
> effort
> as long as it does not call out some TLD for special mention. Perhaps
> phrasing
> it in terms of .example or .test in the IDN scripts will work.
>
> avri
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|