RE: [npoc-voice] comments requested on ICANN Academy draft survey to assess the development needs for individual participants

[Eduardo Monge <eduardo.monge@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear  Caroline,

The survey is meant to collect information from SOs, ACs, SGs and 
constituencies within ICANN about the needs for capacity building on 
ICANN-related issues to be undertaken by the ICANN Academy.

I myself reviewed the survey and had no specific comments on its content.

I do think that filling in this survey when ICANN does publish it  is of great 
importance for NPOC.   I think many NGOs/NFPs  are in great need of this type 
of training and NPOC is now seeking to set up programs that can fill this gap 
with NPOC-ICANN training/capacity building activities.

Let us wait for the survey to be published and see if we put together a NPOC 
response or whether individual NPOC members can also respond to the survey.

Regards,

Eduardo



De: Caroline Figuères [mailto:cfigueres@xxxxxxxx]
Enviado el: lunes, 05 de noviembre de 2012 12:17 a.m.
Para: Eduardo Monge
CC: npoc-voice@xxxxxxxxx
Asunto: Re: [npoc-voice] comments requested on ICANN Academy draft survey to 
assess the development needs for individual participants

Dear Eduardo,
Thank you for sending this document. To answer your question I tried to put 
myself as someone who will receive thr survey and will have to answer it.

To be very honest the context and the purpose of this survey is not really 
clear. So if the purpose is not clear it makes it difficult to check if the 
questions are relevant or even to undestand their meaning, let say to answer 
thrm.

I have to suppose that the questions are relevant so because the people who 
prepare the survey know and understand context and purpose. Unfortunatelly 
because of the lack of background information I cannot follow the logics from 
one question to another.

As a general point I would like to add that I have difficulties to talk 
capacity building/development and just answering questions about trainings.

Maybe I should not answer this kind of questions when just awaked but....

Kind regards
Caroline





Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone

Op 5 nov. 2012 om 02:10 heeft Eduardo Monge 
<eduardo.monge@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:eduardo.monge@xxxxxxxxx>> het volgende 
geschreven:
Dear NPOC Colleagues,

Find below information on a request for comments, issued by ICANN Academy 
Working Group, on the draft survey that this WG has prepared to make an 
assessment on the development needs for individual participants in ICANN`s SOs, 
ACs, SGs and constituencies.

Comments to draft survey can be submitted at the comment`s space available at 
community web site  at 
https://community.icann.org/display/Improve/At-Large+ICANN+Academy+Expanded+Working+Group+Survey+Workspace.
    Feedback to this draft survey must be provided until 5 Nov 2012 23:25 UTC.

I apologize for the late posting.  I hope some of you can send in your comments.

ICANN`s Communications team will very shortly send this survey and NPOC can 
then respond to the questions in the survey.

Regards,


Eduardo Monge
NPOC Communications Committee Chair




De: Alain Berranger 
[mailto:alain.berranger@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:alain.berranger@xxxxxxxxx>]
Enviado el: jueves, 01 de noviembre de 2012 8:56
Para: Eduardo Monge
Asunto: Fwd: [ICANN Academy WG] ICANN Academy - Wrap Up meetings Toronto

...

----------- Forwarded message ----------
From: sandra hoferichter <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 7:34 PM
Subject: [ICANN Academy WG] ICANN Academy - Wrap Up meetings Toronto
To: ICANN Academy WG 
<at-large-icann-academy-ad-hoc-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:at-large-icann-academy-ad-hoc-wg@xxxxxxxxx>>
Dear all,

I hope you arrived meanwhile all safe back home or wherever you had to go after 
ICANN 45, Toronto. With this email I like to provide you with the a short 
update of the 2 Toronto WG meetings.

During the ICANN Academy meeting in Toronto on 17 October 2012 it has been 
agreed to make an assessment on the development needs for individual 
participants in the SOs, ACs, SGs and constituencies. A drafting team 
volunteered to develop a survey to be sent out to applicable ICANN groups. It 
will include questions which will build a foundation for the future effort of 
this working group. The first draft of the survey was discussed and modified 
during the second informal meeting on Friday 19 October 2012 and is attached to 
this email.

Once the survey is evaluated by the WG, it will be sent to ICANN Communications 
for a quick review and comments and then sent to the applicable leaders. We 
will give them around 1 month to reply to this survey. As such, we should have 
the results by the end of November.

The following community members have volunteered with drafting the initial 
version of the Survey.

*         Chuck Gomes

*         Ron Sherwood

*         Yaovi Atohoun

*         Hong Xue

*         YJ Park

*         Sandra Hoferichter

A wiki workspace, where you can find the agreed timeline and also the latest 
version of the survey (as enclosed) has been created. (see: At-Large ICANN 
Academy Expanded Working Group Survey 
Workspace<https://community.icann.org/x/LIY3Ag>) Feel free to post your 
comments there or here on this list.

Please provide your feedback until 5 Nov 2012 23:25 UTC. After this comment 
period we will proceed as agreed in the work plan.

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you like to know some more details 
about the WG meetings or if something is unclear. I expect the transcript soon.

Best Sandra
 _______________________________________________
at-large-icann-academy-ad-hoc-wg mailing list
at-large-icann-academy-ad-hoc-wg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:at-large-icann-academy-ad-hoc-wg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large-icann-academy-ad-hoc-wg
--

<ICANN Academy_survey_20121029.pdf>