ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[npoc-voice]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [npoc-voice] Sessions description draft for Beijing

  • To: "mlemineur@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <mlemineur@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [npoc-voice] Sessions description draft for Beijing
  • From: Caroline Figuères <cfigueres@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:10:55 +0100

Hi Marie-Laure,
I fully share your vision about the role of the youth. Youth is a
broad concept. In some country it is up to 35... But let's take the
definition of 15-24 for this purpose. Many 18 years old are ICT-wiser
than we are! It may be interesting to develop a serious game on this
issue to increase awareness of the younger youth and gather from older
youth useful protection tips!

Kind regards
Caroline


Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone

Op 11 mrt. 2013 om 22:49 heeft "mlemineur@xxxxxxxxxxxx"
<mlemineur@xxxxxxxxxxxx> het volgende geschreven:

>
> Dear Poncelet and all,
>
> I have improved the description of our youth session and incorporated
> Poncelet´s  suggestion to mention the IGF. I am in the process of
> uploading it to the wiki hopefully I can make it for today if not, it will
> be uploaded before our conference call tomorrow.
>
> Also, I think we should be careful on how we focus the issue of the
> involvement of youth and be aware from the very beginning that we do not
> want to promote only a "protection agenda" since there is a tendency from
> adults to ONLY think of youth and the dangers of the Internet and
> therefore only speak of how they should be protected. I have been involved
> with this part for many years now and I acknowlegde that this can not be
> left aside. Awareness-raising activities for promoting self-protection is
> indispensible. Nervertheless, I have also seen that it is key to empower
> youth as subjects of rights and not just limit our vision to promote a
> perception of youth as passive recipients of the protection strategies we
> adults design and implement. This is trap easy to fall in.
>
> In summary, personlly I favor an agenda where youth tells what they can do
> instead of focusing solely on listing what they should be protected from.
>
> I´d love to hear other´s  thoughts on this...
>
> Thanks
>
> Best,
>
> Marie-laure
>
> Hello ML,
>>
>> Thanks for sharing the details of our session, am still awaiting feed back
>> from the Chinese YMCA representative am certain to get it soon, the draft
>> agenda is looking good, I will like us to add something on the IGF on
>> especially on the role of the youths, with the various online data
>> protection and privacy issues going on, as this can feed into a more
>> detailed topic for is for the coming IGF, so it will be great to get
>> discussions on going.
>>
>> Again thank you I will like your thoughts on getting  an aspect of youth
>> and IGF involved in our session.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Poncelet
>>
>> On 26 February 2013 11:21, <mlemineur@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear colleagues,
>>>
>>> As agreed, please find attached the draft of the description for our
>>> sessions in Beijing.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Marie-Laure
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Poncelet O. Ileleji MBCS
>> Coordinator
>> The Gambia YMCAs Computer Training Centre & Digital Studio
>> MDI Road Kanifing South
>> P. O. Box 421 Banjul
>> The Gambia, West Africa
>> Tel: (220) 4370240
>> Fax:(220) 4390793
>> Cell:(220) 9912508
>> Skype: pons_utd
>> *www.ymca.gm
>> www.waigf.org
>> www.aficta.org
>> www.itag.gm
>> www.npoc.org
>> http://www.wsa-mobile.org/node/753
>> *www.diplointernetgovernance.org
>>
>> *
>> *
>
>




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy