Re: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] Pricing Materials

["Nevett, Jonathon" <jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Great. We are discussing this very issue at a meeting tomorrow at 3:30 ET.  It 
would be extraordinarily helpful to have this input from the registries prior 
to this meeting. Thanks. Jon

 -----Original Message-----
From:   John Jeffrey [mailto:john.jeffrey@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent:   Thursday, October 12, 2006 12:41 AM Eastern Standard Time
To:     Nevett, Jonathon
Cc:     Daniel Halloran; pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:        Re: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] Pricing Materials

We received responses from all four registries and will be posting  
these this week.

On Oct 11, 2006, at 1:10 PM, Nevett, Jonathon wrote:

> Dan:  Did you receive any documents by the 10/10 deadline?  If so,  
> will
> you share with the Task Force forthwith?  Thanks.  Jon
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Halloran [mailto:daniel.halloran@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 12:16 PM
> To: Nevett, Jonathon
> Cc: John Jeffrey; pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] Pricing Materials
>
> On 4  Oct 2006, at 13:56, Nevett, Jonathon wrote:
>
>> Dan:
>>
>> Per your request on the GNSO PDP-Feb 06 Task Force call today, it
>> would be helpful to the Task Force to have any information
>> regarding registry pricing issues that may have been prepared by
>> staff and/or by the .biz, .org, or .info registries.  Per the
>> Preliminary Report and the Secretary's Notice from the 9/25 Board
>> meeting, it appears that the registries may have responded to the
>> Board's request for more information ("various board members
>> expressed concerns about whether the issues raised in the public
>> comments had been appropriately responded to by the registries.").
>> Similarly, as you know, the Board requested that the registries
>> respond in further detail on the pricing issues by 10 October 2006
>> (the "Board specifically expressed a desire to see communications
>> from each of the registries responding to the public comments").
>> ...
>
> Jon,
>
> Thank you for your inquiry.  I've checked into this, and we don't
> have any additional documents that are responsive to your request
> beyond what's already been posted, e.g. <http://www.icann.org/
> announcements/announcement-1-11sep06.htm>.  I understand that we have
> not yet received the formal responses of the registries to the public
> comments, but as you pointed out that response is expected shortly
> <http://www.icann.org/minutes/secretarys-notice-27sep06.htm>.
>
> Best regards,
> Dan

John Jeffrey
john.jeffrey@xxxxxxxxx