RE: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] Pricing Materials

["Marilyn Cade" <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I add my interest to Jon's since the Group A is meeting at 11, and if there
are any relevant comments in the responses from the registries, we would
also like to have the opportunity to review them. we are also meeting on
Tuesday of next week, so I may be able to put them on the agenda for that
meeting, if necessary. 

 

  _____  

From: owner-pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Nevett, Jonathon
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 7:05 AM
To: John Jeffrey
Cc: Daniel Halloran; pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] Pricing Materials

 

Great. We are discussing this very issue at a meeting tomorrow at 3:30 ET.
It would be extraordinarily helpful to have this input from the registries
prior to this meeting. Thanks. Jon

 -----Original Message-----
From:   John Jeffrey [mailto:john.jeffrey@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent:   Thursday, October 12, 2006 12:41 AM Eastern Standard Time
To:     Nevett, Jonathon
Cc:     Daniel Halloran; pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:        Re: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] Pricing Materials

We received responses from all four registries and will be posting 
these this week.

On Oct 11, 2006, at 1:10 PM, Nevett, Jonathon wrote:

> Dan:  Did you receive any documents by the 10/10 deadline?  If so, 
> will
> you share with the Task Force forthwith?  Thanks.  Jon
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Halloran [mailto:daniel.halloran@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 12:16 PM
> To: Nevett, Jonathon
> Cc: John Jeffrey; pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] Pricing Materials
>
> On 4  Oct 2006, at 13:56, Nevett, Jonathon wrote:
>
>> Dan:
>>
>> Per your request on the GNSO PDP-Feb 06 Task Force call today, it
>> would be helpful to the Task Force to have any information
>> regarding registry pricing issues that may have been prepared by
>> staff and/or by the .biz, .org, or .info registries.  Per the
>> Preliminary Report and the Secretary's Notice from the 9/25 Board
>> meeting, it appears that the registries may have responded to the
>> Board's request for more information ("various board members
>> expressed concerns about whether the issues raised in the public
>> comments had been appropriately responded to by the registries.").
>> Similarly, as you know, the Board requested that the registries
>> respond in further detail on the pricing issues by 10 October 2006
>> (the "Board specifically expressed a desire to see communications
>> from each of the registries responding to the public comments").
>> ...
>
> Jon,
>
> Thank you for your inquiry.  I've checked into this, and we don't
> have any additional documents that are responsive to your request
> beyond what's already been posted, e.g. <http://www.icann.org/
> announcements/announcement-1-11sep06.htm>.  I understand that we have
> not yet received the formal responses of the registries to the public
> comments, but as you pointed out that response is expected shortly
> <http://www.icann.org/minutes/secretarys-notice-27sep06.htm>.
>
> Best regards,
> Dan

John Jeffrey
john.jeffrey@xxxxxxxxx