<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] Presentation to council
- To: "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] Presentation to council
- From: "Nevett, Jonathon" <jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 07:29:45 -0500
Sorry for my lack of clarity. We are under the impression that the
"Renewal Expectancy" option already includes the right to bid at ICANN's
discretion. Thanks. Jon
-----Original Message-----
From: Avri Doria [mailto:avri@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 7:20 AM
To: Nevett, Jonathon
Cc: pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] Presentation to council
hi,
On 6 dec 2006, at 09.34, Nevett, Jonathon wrote:
> Avri: On renewal, I would suggest changing the second option to say
> "may rebid at ICANN's discretion." That's what the RC supports.
> Thanks. Jon
Thanks for the note.
If I understand correctly, you are offering a 4th possibility which
seems to me to be a compromise between proposal 1 - must rebid and
proposal 2 - renewal expectancy. Since renewal expectancy was
suggested by NCUC i would not want to change their proposal without
their concurrence, but I think it is a good suggestion that might be
able to bring those who support Proposal 1 and 2 into agreement.
What do other think about this?
a.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|