RE: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] a proposed recommendations for ToR 5
- To: "'Avri Doria'" <avri@xxxxxxx>, "'PDPfeb06'" <pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] a proposed recommendations for ToR 5
- From: "Marilyn Cade" <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 13:05:22 -0500
My proposed additions to the agenda:
*Report from the 'registry/staff' working effort [e.g the registries had
accepted a request from the TF/a status report is needed for today}
I am also providing separately a mark up on the draft recommendation.
Regards, Marilyn Cade, BC Rep to the TF
[mailto:owner-pdp-pcceg-feb06@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 10:05 PM
Subject: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] a proposed recommendations for ToR 5
On 31 jan 2007, at 16.39, Liz Williams wrote:
> I haven't seen any further traffic on the TOR 5 proposed policy
> recommendations -- is anyone going to start with a proposal?
Well since it was my suggestion that we should start with individual
proposals, let me start with one.
TERM OF REFERENCE 5
Uses of registry data
> 5a Examine whether or not there should be a policy regarding the
> use of registry data for purposes other than for which it was
> collected, and if so, what the elements of that policy should be.
a. There is no clear need for a new policy on the use of registry
data, including traffic data, for purposes other then which is was
b. There is, however, a need for exhaustive public study by an
outside agency on the data collected and the uses to which it is put.
c. It is recommended that a best practices document be published as a
guideline for Registry data collection and use
> 5b. Determine whether any policy is necessary to ensure non-
> discriminatory access to registry data that is made available to
> third parties.
a. There is currently no clear need for a new policy on the use of
registry data, including traffic data, for purposes other then which
is was collected. Based on the results of the exhaustive external
study and public discussions recommended in 5a (b), the GNSO council
should consider the creation of a PDP that would include policy
recommendations for new, as well as for existing Registry agreements.