Re: [soac-mapo] RE: Initial Draft ToR for Recommendation 6 Implementation Discussion

[Antony Van Couvering <avc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I agree very strongly with this.   Part of the WG's defining charter should be 
that it cause no delays.


On Aug 20, 2010, at 7:45 PM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:

> My second edit aims to strengthen the wording on the group's intended 
> timeline. I have deleted the reference to the possibility of doing an interim 
> report if the group does not meet its intended deadline. Another starting 
> principle of this group is that it would not cause more delays but instead be 
> a expeditious affair. That being the case, I do not think the ToR should even 
> entertain the notion that the group might not meet its initial deadline. 
> Suggesting it might not is as good as saying it won't. The group should aim 
> to meet the deadline required to get its report to the Board within the 
> deadline set for its September retreat, period.