Re: [soac-mapo] RE: Initial Draft ToR for Recommendation 6 Implementation Discussion
- To: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] RE: Initial Draft ToR for Recommendation 6 Implementation Discussion
- From: Antony Van Couvering <avc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 22:31:04 -0400
I agree very strongly with this. Part of the WG's defining charter should be
that it cause no delays.
On Aug 20, 2010, at 7:45 PM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
> My second edit aims to strengthen the wording on the group's intended
> timeline. I have deleted the reference to the possibility of doing an interim
> report if the group does not meet its intended deadline. Another starting
> principle of this group is that it would not cause more delays but instead be
> a expeditious affair. That being the case, I do not think the ToR should even
> entertain the notion that the group might not meet its initial deadline.
> Suggesting it might not is as good as saying it won't. The group should aim
> to meet the deadline required to get its report to the Board within the
> deadline set for its September retreat, period.