Re: [soac-mapo] Combined draft charter redline for your review

[Antony Van Couvering <avc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Agree with Marilyn.   We are all free to communicate with each other on 
different topics (including this one) outside of the view of others.


On Aug 22, 2010, at 6:13 PM, Marilyn Cade wrote:

>  I am okay with this approach.  I am not in any way thinking it appropriate 
> to subscribe non GAC members to the GAC list. The BC doesn't have anyone but 
> BC members on our list, although we have an archive for routine  
> communications. And, as we all know, the GNSO Council, charged with policy 
> management, also has an exclusive list -- I can read it, but I can't post to 
> it, since I am not a Councilor. :-) 
> The good news for me is that the GAC is participating in the discussions. 
> 
> I look forward to tomorrow's call. 
> 
> I will look again at the updated ToR, but it was looking good to me with the 
> edits made. Let's advance this work, so that there is something to say! 
> 
> Marilyn 
> 
> 
> > Subject: RE: [soac-mapo] Combined draft charter redline for your review
> > Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2010 18:01:23 -0400
> > From: cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > To: avri@xxxxxxx; soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx
> > 
> > 
> > Avri,
> > 
> > I think it is fair to assume that the GAC is not going to let non-GAC 
> > members join their list. I cannot speak for the GAC, but I believe that the 
> > quickest way to ensure that all GAC members had the opportunity to see the 
> > Rec6 CWG discussion was to subscribe their distribution list in the Rec6 
> > CWG. It doesn't seem to me that it would have been appropriate to 
> > automatically register every GAC member on the Rec6 CWG list; that is a 
> > decision each individual GAC member has to make.
> > 
> > So I think the answer to your question is 'yes', they can see our 
> > discussion but we cannot see theirs except for any that occurs on our list.
> > 
> > Frank/Glen - Please correct me if I have characterized any of this 
> > incorrectly.
> > 
> > Chuck 
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] On
> > > Behalf Of Avri Doria
> > > Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 4:54 PM
> > > To: soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] Combined draft charter redline for your review
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > Does this mean they can see our discussions, but we can't see theirs?
> > > Why do we need separate lists in this multistakeholder environment?
> > > 
> > > a.
> > > 
> > > On 22 Aug 2010, at 14:14, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> > > 
> > > > I know for a fact that Heather Dryden and Frank March are on the list
> > > and quite sure that the GAC distribution list is on the list so all GAC
> > > members should be able to see the list traffic.
> > > >
> > > > Glen/Gisella - would you please send the list of subscribers?
> > > >
> > > > Chuck
> > > >
> > > > From: Antony Van Couvering <avc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > To: Gomes, Chuck
> > > > Cc: Liz Gasster <liz.gasster@xxxxxxxxx>; soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx <soac-
> > > mapo@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Sent: Sun Aug 22 10:57:19 2010
> > > > Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] Combined draft charter redline for your
> > > review
> > > >
> > > > Is anyone from GAC even on this list? Chuck or Liz, can you clarify
> > > if this list includes GAC members, and if so, who?
> > > >
> > > > I don't want to "out" anyone who wishes to remain anonymous, but
> > > quite frankly the entire point of stopping for a month was to wait for
> > > the GAC to show up. Their members are critical participants, because
> > > the previous Rec. 6 foundered on their objection. So it's absolutely
> > > critical to have their involvement. If not, it's a sterile echo-
> > > chamber exercise.
> > > >
> > > > Antony
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Aug 22, 2010, at 9:15 AM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Thank you very much for doing this Liz. This will be very helpful.
> > > >>
> > > >> I note though that all the contributors to date have either been
> > > from the GNSO or ALAC . It would be extremely helpful if some members
> > > of the GAC or ccNSO commented on the edits even if it is strictly in
> > > your personal capacity. If there is no disagreement with the proposed
> > > edits, fine; if there is, we cannot deal with them if we are not aware
> > > of them.
> > > >>
> > > >> Chuck
> > > >>
> > > >> From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx]
> > > On Behalf Of Liz Gasster
> > > >> Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2010 11:47 AM
> > > >> To: soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx
> > > >> Subject: [soac-mapo] Combined draft charter redline for your review
> > > >>
> > > >> All,
> > > >>
> > > >> Attached please find a redline edit that should encompass the edits
> > > by Milton, Robin, Avri, Michele, Marilyn, Stéphane and Richard. Please
> > > use this version for further edits.
> > > >>
> > > >> Also, please let me know if I've missed anything.
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks! Liz
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > 
> > 
> >