RE: [soac-mapo] Revised draft Charter Terms of Reference for your review

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Any opposition to Avri's addition?

Chuck

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 11:12 AM
> To: soac-mapo
> Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] Revised draft Charter Terms of Reference for
> your review
> 
> 
> 
> On 23 Aug 2010, at 18:31, Liz Gasster wrote:
> 
> > <Rec6 TOR updated as of 23 Aug 2300 UTC.doc>
> 
> I am personally mostly fine with tis version of the ToR.
> 
> While I understand and accept the idea of removing the word
> preliminary, it does leave the ToR sort of dangling as to what happens
> after this report.  but not stating what happens after this report, it
> makes it seem as if that is the end of the story.
> 
> And it may be.
> 
> Perhaps adding something like the following, in addition to removing
> preliminary, would help:
> 
> After submission of the report, the CWG will review what, if anything,
> remains to be done on the defined tasks and will communicate that to
> the ALAC, GAC and GNSO council.
> 
> (note i put the 3 in alphabetical order which is something i recommend
> for elsewhere in the report)
> 
> a.
>