<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [soac-mapo] Request for volunteers
- To: soac-mapo <soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] Request for volunteers
- From: Richard Tindal <richardtindal@xxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 12:20:30 -0700
I dont recall agreement to do away with the IO.
I'll check the transcript, but if I assented then I'd like to withdraw that
assent.
I think there are legitimate reasons for IO
Richard
On Sep 8, 2010, at 11:46 AM, Robin Gross wrote:
> I am also keen to work on a statement regarding the independent objector.
> However, we should be sure we are on the same page. There was agreement on
> the call last week that we do not want an independent objector, so that
> should be removed from DAG4.
>
> We have to remember to keep objections to new gtlds "objective" as per
> principle 1. If no religion, no govt, no community, no business, no cultural
> org, no person, etc. objects to a proposal for a new gtld, there is little
> grounds for expecting an "independent objector" to have any. That would
> hardly be an "objective" standard, if none of these interests objects, but
> the ICANN Morality Tzar can be secretly lobbied into filing an "independent"
> objection. So that is the direction I expect a statement from this group to
> flow. Is there any disagreement with this approach?
>
> Thanks,
> Robin
>
>
>
>
> On Sep 8, 2010, at 10:55 AM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
>
>>
>> Thanks Evan. I believe Richard is working with Bertrand on the community
>> class of objections. We added it as a 15th thread today. Please comment on
>> what Richard submits to the list.
>>
>> Regarding the Independent Objector, please draft a statement and/or
>> recommendation for group consideration by end of the day on Thursday.
>>
>> Chuck
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: evanleibovitch@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:evanleibovitch@xxxxxxxxx] On
>>> Behalf Of Evan Leibovitch
>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 1:43 PM
>>> To: Gomes, Chuck
>>> Cc: soac-mapo
>>> Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] Request for volunteers
>>>
>>> I would like to help with wording about the Independent Objector, as
>>> well as any changes to the community class of objections (if that is
>>> still being considered).
>>>
>>> - Evan
>>
>
>
>
>
> IP JUSTICE
> Robin Gross, Executive Director
> 1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA 94117 USA
> p: +1-415-553-6261 f: +1-415-462-6451
> w: http://www.ipjustice.org e: robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|