<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [soac-mapo] Request for volunteers
- To: Richard Tindal <richardtindal@xxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] Request for volunteers
- From: Stuart Lawley <stuart@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 15:31:26 -0400
I have been on every call and do not recall an agreement for abolishing the
Independent Objector.
Stuart
On Sep 8, 2010, at 3:20 PM, Richard Tindal wrote:
> I dont recall agreement to do away with the IO.
>
> I'll check the transcript, but if I assented then I'd like to withdraw that
> assent.
>
> I think there are legitimate reasons for IO
>
> Richard
>
>
> On Sep 8, 2010, at 11:46 AM, Robin Gross wrote:
>
>> I am also keen to work on a statement regarding the independent objector.
>> However, we should be sure we are on the same page. There was agreement on
>> the call last week that we do not want an independent objector, so that
>> should be removed from DAG4.
>>
>> We have to remember to keep objections to new gtlds "objective" as per
>> principle 1. If no religion, no govt, no community, no business, no
>> cultural org, no person, etc. objects to a proposal for a new gtld, there is
>> little grounds for expecting an "independent objector" to have any. That
>> would hardly be an "objective" standard, if none of these interests objects,
>> but the ICANN Morality Tzar can be secretly lobbied into filing an
>> "independent" objection. So that is the direction I expect a statement
>> from this group to flow. Is there any disagreement with this approach?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Robin
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sep 8, 2010, at 10:55 AM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks Evan. I believe Richard is working with Bertrand on the community
>>> class of objections. We added it as a 15th thread today. Please comment
>>> on what Richard submits to the list.
>>>
>>> Regarding the Independent Objector, please draft a statement and/or
>>> recommendation for group consideration by end of the day on Thursday.
>>>
>>> Chuck
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: evanleibovitch@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:evanleibovitch@xxxxxxxxx] On
>>>> Behalf Of Evan Leibovitch
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 1:43 PM
>>>> To: Gomes, Chuck
>>>> Cc: soac-mapo
>>>> Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] Request for volunteers
>>>>
>>>> I would like to help with wording about the Independent Objector, as
>>>> well as any changes to the community class of objections (if that is
>>>> still being considered).
>>>>
>>>> - Evan
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> IP JUSTICE
>> Robin Gross, Executive Director
>> 1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA 94117 USA
>> p: +1-415-553-6261 f: +1-415-462-6451
>> w: http://www.ipjustice.org e: robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|