Re: [soac-mapo] Request for volunteers

[Konstantinos Komaitis <k.komaitis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks for this Chuck. I would be glad to draft a statement on: 1)the use of 
the term 'incitement' and 2) use of the Center of Expertise of the ICC as the 
DRSP.

I believe Mary has already offered to work on number 1, so I can work with her 
on this. I will be working on number 2 and if anyone else in interested please 
do let me know and we can work together.

One suggestion: as we are still to discuss in detail both the use of 
'incitement' (this has been discussed at some level but I think that we still 
have not discussed it extensively amongst us) and the use of ICC, I would think 
it would be better for this group to have a statement on these two issues 
rather a recommendation.

I hope this suggestion satisfies the group but in any case I would be willing 
to go with whatever you all think is more beneficial.

Thanks

KK


On 08/09/2010 18:23, "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In our Rec6 CWG meeting today, it was suggested that I call for volunteers who 
might be willing to draft a possible recommendation or statement regarding the 
remaining discussion threads:

*       Use of the term 'incitement'

*       Quick Look procedure

*       Use of the Center of Expertise of the ICC as the DRSP

*       Independent Objector

*       Timing of Rec6 Dispute Resolution

*       Incitement to discrimination criterion

There are a couple other threads not included that volunteers already agreed to 
work on.

If you are willing to volunteer for one or more of these, I would suggest that 
you draft a recommendation and/or statement that attempts to accommodate 
multiple views expressed in the CWG and not just your own.  Please submit any 
drafts you are willing to prepare by end of the day on Thursday so that we can 
discuss them on the list and in our meeting on Friday.  Our goal will be to try 
to discuss all remaining threads on Friday.

Thanks, Chuck