RE: [soac-mapo] Request for volunteers

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Sounds good to me Konstantinos.  Thanks.

Chuck

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Konstantinos Komaitis [mailto:k.komaitis@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 4:37 AM
> To: Gomes, Chuck; soac-mapo
> Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] Request for volunteers
> 
> Thanks for this Chuck. I would be glad to draft a statement on: 1)the
> use of the term 'incitement' and 2) use of the Center of Expertise of
> the ICC as the DRSP.
> 
> I believe Mary has already offered to work on number 1, so I can work
> with her on this. I will be working on number 2 and if anyone else in
> interested please do let me know and we can work together.
> 
> One suggestion: as we are still to discuss in detail both the use of
> 'incitement' (this has been discussed at some level but I think that
we
> still have not discussed it extensively amongst us) and the use of
ICC,
> I would think it would be better for this group to have a statement on
> these two issues rather a recommendation.
> 
> I hope this suggestion satisfies the group but in any case I would be
> willing to go with whatever you all think is more beneficial.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> KK
> 
> 
> On 08/09/2010 18:23, "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> In our Rec6 CWG meeting today, it was suggested that I call for
> volunteers who might be willing to draft a possible recommendation or
> statement regarding the remaining discussion threads:
> 
> *       Use of the term 'incitement'
> 
> *       Quick Look procedure
> 
> *       Use of the Center of Expertise of the ICC as the DRSP
> 
> *       Independent Objector
> 
> *       Timing of Rec6 Dispute Resolution
> 
> *       Incitement to discrimination criterion
> 
> There are a couple other threads not included that volunteers already
> agreed to work on.
> 
> If you are willing to volunteer for one or more of these, I would
> suggest that you draft a recommendation and/or statement that attempts
> to accommodate multiple views expressed in the CWG and not just your
> own.  Please submit any drafts you are willing to prepare by end of
the
> day on Thursday so that we can discuss them on the list and in our
> meeting on Friday.  Our goal will be to try to discuss all remaining
> threads on Friday.
> 
> Thanks, Chuck