ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[soac-mapo]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [soac-mapo] The use of the Centre of Expertise of the ICC as the DRSP

  • To: Konstantinos Komaitis <k.komaitis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] The use of the Centre of Expertise of the ICC as the DRSP
  • From: Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 13:57:26 -0500

I support this writing in its entirety.

Carlton

==============================
Carlton A Samuels
Mobile: 876-818-1799
Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround
=============================


On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Konstantinos Komaitis <
k.komaitis@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> Please find attached a very draft statement and recommendation on the 'use
> of the center of expertise of the ICC as the DRSP'. Considering that this
> topic has not been discussed as of yet (I think it in the list of tomorrow's
> call), there were not many views expressed on this issue by the group -
> actually I can only recall a couple.
> I apologize in advance if I have misunderstood or misinterpreted anyone's
> view on this issue or I have left someone's points out of this document (I
> did not have time to refer to the mp3).
>
> Most probably I will be in tomorrow's call but I might be a bit late.
>
> Thanks
>
> KK
>
>
> On 08/09/2010 18:23, "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> In our Rec6 CWG meeting today, it was suggested that I call for volunteers
> who might be willing to draft a possible recommendation or statement
> regarding the remaining discussion threads:
>
> *       Use of the term 'incitement'
>
> *       Quick Look procedure
>
> *       Use of the Center of Expertise of the ICC as the DRSP
>
> *       Independent Objector
>
> *       Timing of Rec6 Dispute Resolution
>
> *       Incitement to discrimination criterion
>
> There are a couple other threads not included that volunteers already
> agreed to work on.
>
> If you are willing to volunteer for one or more of these, I would suggest
> that you draft a recommendation and/or statement that attempts to
> accommodate multiple views expressed in the CWG and not just your own.
>  Please submit any drafts you are willing to prepare by end of the day on
> Thursday so that we can discuss them on the list and in our meeting on
> Friday.  Our goal will be to try to discuss all remaining threads on Friday.
>
> Thanks, Chuck
>
>


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy