<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[soac-mapo] RE: The use of the Centre of Expertise of the ICC as the DRSP
- To: "Konstantinos Komaitis" <k.komaitis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "soac-mapo" <soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [soac-mapo] RE: The use of the Centre of Expertise of the ICC as the DRSP
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 15:02:17 -0400
Thanks Konstantinos. I encourage everyone to comment on this before our
meeting tomorrow.
Chuck
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Konstantinos Komaitis [mailto:k.komaitis@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 1:30 PM
> To: Gomes, Chuck; soac-mapo
> Subject: The use of the Centre of Expertise of the ICC as the DRSP
>
> Dear all,
>
> Please find attached a very draft statement and recommendation on the
> 'use of the center of expertise of the ICC as the DRSP'. Considering
> that this topic has not been discussed as of yet (I think it in the
> list of tomorrow's call), there were not many views expressed on this
> issue by the group - actually I can only recall a couple.
> I apologize in advance if I have misunderstood or misinterpreted
> anyone's view on this issue or I have left someone's points out of
this
> document (I did not have time to refer to the mp3).
>
> Most probably I will be in tomorrow's call but I might be a bit late.
>
> Thanks
>
> KK
>
>
> On 08/09/2010 18:23, "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> In our Rec6 CWG meeting today, it was suggested that I call for
> volunteers who might be willing to draft a possible recommendation or
> statement regarding the remaining discussion threads:
>
> * Use of the term 'incitement'
>
> * Quick Look procedure
>
> * Use of the Center of Expertise of the ICC as the DRSP
>
> * Independent Objector
>
> * Timing of Rec6 Dispute Resolution
>
> * Incitement to discrimination criterion
>
> There are a couple other threads not included that volunteers already
> agreed to work on.
>
> If you are willing to volunteer for one or more of these, I would
> suggest that you draft a recommendation and/or statement that attempts
> to accommodate multiple views expressed in the CWG and not just your
> own. Please submit any drafts you are willing to prepare by end of
the
> day on Thursday so that we can discuss them on the list and in our
> meeting on Friday. Our goal will be to try to discuss all remaining
> threads on Friday.
>
> Thanks, Chuck
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|