<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [soac-mapo] Revised Summary of Recommendations - Please comment by EOD today
- To: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [soac-mapo] Revised Summary of Recommendations - Please comment by EOD today
- From: Antony Van Couvering <avc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 08:32:02 -0700
This is my major comment on the draft as well. It appears to read as if an
objection based on the law of one nation is sufficient as a veto. I'm pretty
sure we agreed that this was not the case.
Antony
On Sep 11, 2010, at 6:26 AM, Avri Doria wrote:
> i can't see anyone calling an objection based on national law, frivolous.
> But it should be considered insufficient and invalid.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|