RE: [soac-mapo] Updated Rec6 CWGStatus Report

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Yes Margie, one call this week and one on Monday.  A call on Thursday
may not be possible for me but I should be able to do one on Friday.  In
the meantime, I will try to encourage more progress on the list.  I may
have more time tomorrow to work on this tomorrow.

 

Chuck

 

From: Margie Milam [mailto:Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 12:01 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck; soac-mapo
Subject: RE: [soac-mapo] Updated Rec6 CWGStatus Report

 

Hi Chuck-

 

I'll include these changes.   Is the suggestion for Monday's call in
addition to another call this week?  I think we need more than one call
to get through the rest of the recommendations.   On last Monday's call
we went through five out of 16 topics,  and didn't even fully complete
the analysis for those topics.  

 

I don't see how the CWG could realistically complete its analysis on the
remaining 11 topics, plus resolve the open issues on the first 5 issues
in two hours.  My suggestion is schedule a 2 hour call tomorrow, and
then another 2 hour call on Monday.  

 

Margie

 

From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 7:39 AM
To: Margie Milam; soac-mapo
Subject: RE: [soac-mapo] Updated Rec6 CWGStatus Report

 

Thank you very much Margie.

 

One quick suggestion is that we probably should suggest that the final
report is targeted for 21 September.  I think we will need a meeting on
Monday and the 21st would give you a little more time to apply the
results decided in that meeting.

 

I suggest you change the following statement at the end of Section 2.5:
"As of the date of this Status Report, the Rec6  CWG has determined the
initial support levels for the recommendations and statements described
in Annex 3  for the first five of 16 issues. "  Here is a possible
change: ".      As of the date of this Status Report, the Rec6  CWG has
determined the initial support levels for the recommendations and
statements described in Annex 3  for the first three issues plus 4.3. "
I think that Issue 5 is still TBD based on the work going on for 4.1 &
4.2.

 

I am not sure that we should include the numerical scores of consensus
for issues that we have resolved, i.e., issue categories 1, 2, 3 and
4.3. We did agree though to do that for those that we are not finished
with.  If the group thinks, otherwise I am okay with that.  We are
trying to get a sense of support from more than those who responded to
the poll and in doing that we probably won't have time to add to the
counts accurately.  Also in some cases, one person may be representing
the views of their group, which means that counts can be a little
misleading.

 

In the parenthetical comment of the support level for recommendation
4.1, I suggest that we say "New language is being explored for this
item."  The same comment could be added to 4.2.

 

We probably should also add the following to Section 4, Recommended Next
Steps: "The CWG may recommend that a public comment period be opened
after submission of its Final Report."

 

Chuck

 

P.S. - This was prepared while taking notes in an IGF workshop so please
make sure my suggestions make sense.

 

From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Margie Milam
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 4:03 PM
To: soac-mapo
Subject: [soac-mapo] Updated Rec6 CWGStatus Report
Importance: High

 

Dear All,

 

Please find attached an updated report that takes into account the
comments received during yesterday's call.   I still need to proofread
and format the report, but would appreciate your comments by 1700 UTC
tomorrow, as I plan to update the report to include the results of the
poll that Marika circulated earlier today, and then send it directly to
the ICANN Secretary for distribution to the Board.  


For those of you that may have missed yesterday's call,  this report is
only a status report, and will be updated to become the final Report
when the CWG finishes its review of the polling conducted on the 16
issues.     We expect that the final Report will be published shortly.
In the Status Report, I suggest that it will be done by 20 Sept, to set
expectations for any board members that may read the Status Report.

 

Also, please note that the ICANN Secretary was sent a note on behalf of
the Rec6 CWG requesting that the Report be included in the Board's
materials for the September retreat.   

 

Best Regards,

 

Margie

_________

Margie Milam

Senior Policy Counselor

ICANN

_________