Re: [soac-mapo] Please participate - Poll on updated recommendations

[Richard Tindal <richardtindal@xxxxxx>]

I was also surprised by the number of 'no' votes on this.

In addition to the possible reasons suggested by Chuck (below) is it because 
some felt that it implied a change to the existing Community Objection standard?

Am interested to hear why people voted against this.

RT


On Sep 15, 2010, at 9:53 AM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:

> I have concerns about the poll results so far on the following:
>  
> “Recommendation 2.2: If individual governments have objections based on 
> contradiction with specific national laws, such objections should be 
> submitted through the Community Objections procedure?”
> It was my impression that this was a very important point for governments and 
> I believe that AGv4 allows it anyway.  For those that oppose this, is it 
> because you don’t think it should be stated by this group or do you think 
> that the guidebook should be changed to not allow this?  If the latter, I 
> think that may be a problem in terms of getting support of government members 
> of our group.
>  
> Chuck
>  
> From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf 
> Of Marika Konings
> Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 2:28 PM
> To: soac-mapo
> Subject: [soac-mapo] Please participate - Poll on updated recommendations
> Importance: High
>  
> Dear All,
> 
> You’ll hereby find the link to the doodle poll on the recommendations that 
> were updated on the basis of yesterday’s discussion: 
> http://www.doodle.com/3qyfei92icsqw3ie . Please indicate in the poll for each 
> of the updated recommendations whether you support the recommendation or not. 
> You should use the attached document as your reference tool. 
> 
> Please complete the poll at the latest by Wednesday 15 September at 17.00 UTC.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Marika