<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[soac-mapo] RE: Clarification needed on when higher Board threshold is needed
- To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx" <soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx>, Margie Milam <Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx>, Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [soac-mapo] RE: Clarification needed on when higher Board threshold is needed
- From: Milton L Mueller <mueller@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 07:46:36 -0400
From: owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-mapo@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Gomes, Chuck
I think it would help us to clarify various positions on when higher Board
threshold is needed. To facilitate that, let me ask the following questions:
1. Some have been very specific that a 2/3 majority of the Board
should be required to uphold an objection. Am I correct in assuming that this
would be the same regardless of the input provided by the expert panel?
In my preference, yes.
2. Others have said that a 2/3 majority of the Board should be
required to approve a string for entry into the root. Is this also independent
of the input from the experts?
Not applicable to me - I don't think there should be a 2/3 majority for simple
entry into the root. The Board and GNSO have promulgated policies and
procedures to be met by applicants. If they meet them, the Board should merely
ascertain that and add it to the root. I do not understand the need for a
supermajority here. More important, I do not understand the relevance of this
question to our CWG WG. If no objection is present, then our discussions don't
apply, do they? Why should we be making policy or
3. The two above questions can probably be asked in one: Whenever a
higher threshold is required for the Board to make a decision on a string, is
that threshold independent of the input from the experts?
Yes (in my preference)
Assuming that the answer to these questions is yes in each case, it seems like
we need to poll support for the following that I think relate to issue 5 so I
will number them accordingly:
5.1 A higher threshold of the Board should be required to uphold an objection.
5.2 A higher threshold of the Board should be required to approve a string.
5.3 The higher threshold should be at least 2/3.
5.4 Approval of a string should only require a simple majority of the Board
regardless of the input from the experts.
5.5 Approval of a string should only require a simple majority of the Board
except when the expert input indicates otherwise, in which case a higher
threshold should be required.
I hope these questions help us narrow down what level agreement we have on
these issues. I believe that it is okay to support more than one of these
except where the answers are contradictory. Please feel free to make
suggestions, comment and ask questions.
Margie/Marika - Let's add these questions to the next Doodle poll,
understanding that they might change before we initiate the poll later today.
Chuck
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|