Re: [soac-mapo] Please participate - new CWG Rec 6 Poll

[Jon Nevett <jon@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I agree with Avri -- I thought that we were going to poll 2.2 with the 
following change:

>> “Recommendation 2.2: If individual governments have objections based on 
>> contradiction with specific national laws, such objections MAY be submitted 
>> through the Community Objections procedure OUTLINED IN DAGv4.”


Thanks.

Jon

On Sep 16, 2010, at 2:57 PM, Avri Doria wrote:

> 
> 
> On 16 Sep 2010, at 18:50, Marika Konings wrote:
> 
>> Dear All,
>> 
>> Please complete the following doodle poll 
>> (http://www.doodle.com/yr9hatbfzr4uq8im) for the updated recommendations 
>> that are attached. In cases where there are multiple choices, it is okay to 
>> say that you support more than one if it doesn’t go against any other 
>> responses you made.
>> 
>> Please complete the poll by Friday 17 September at 17.00 UTC at the latest. 
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Marika
>> <Rec6 CWG Poll 16 Sep 2010.doc>
> 
> 
> Explanation of votes
> 
> 2.2: If individual governments have objections based on contradiction with 
> specific national laws, such objections should be submitted through the 
> Community Objections procedure.
> 
> 
> I do  not see why we are telling them they _should_ submit an objection.  
> They _may_ submit, but why are we placing an obligation on them to do so?
> 
> 
> 5.2  A higher threshold of the Board should be required to approve a string.
> 
> 5.5  Approval of a string should only require a simple majority of the Board 
> except when the expert input indicates otherwise, in which case a higher 
> threshold should be required.
> 
> Voted no on these two because i do not understand.
> 
> In this recommendation I think there is only 1 vote, whether to uphold the 
> objection or not.
> I do not understand under what circumstance there will be a vote to approve a 
> string under this recommendation.
> 
> As far as I can tell, they will not be asked to approve a strong, until the 
> end of the whole application process.  That vote should be a majority vote.
> 
> 
> a.
> 
>