Re: [soac-mapo] Please participate - new CWG Rec 6 Poll
Yes, I only voted "yes" in the poll to 2.2 because I shared the same understanding as below. But it should really be explicitly stated in the Rec. as below or support for it will be lost (including mine). Thanks, Robin On Sep 16, 2010, at 12:21 PM, Jon Nevett wrote: I agree with Avri -- I thought that we were going to poll 2.2 with the following change:“Recommendation 2.2: If individual governments have objections based on contradiction with specific national laws, such objections MAY be submitted through the Community Objections procedure OUTLINED IN DAGv4.”Thanks. Jon On Sep 16, 2010, at 2:57 PM, Avri Doria wrote:On 16 Sep 2010, at 18:50, Marika Konings wrote:Dear All,Please complete the following doodle poll (http://www.doodle.com/ yr9hatbfzr4uq8im) for the updated recommendations that are attached. In cases where there are multiple choices, it is okay to say that you support more than one if it doesn’t go against any other responses you made.Please complete the poll by Friday 17 September at 17.00 UTC at the latest.Thanks, Marika <Rec6 CWG Poll 16 Sep 2010.doc>Explanation of votes2.2: If individual governments have objections based on contradiction with specific national laws, such objections should be submitted through the Community Objections procedure.I do not see why we are telling them they _should_ submit an objection. They _may_ submit, but why are we placing an obligation on them to do so?5.2 A higher threshold of the Board should be required to approve a string.5.5 Approval of a string should only require a simple majority of the Board except when the expert input indicates otherwise, in which case a higher threshold should be required.Voted no on these two because i do not understand.In this recommendation I think there is only 1 vote, whether to uphold the objection or not. I do not understand under what circumstance there will be a vote to approve a string under this recommendation.As far as I can tell, they will not be asked to approve a strong, until the end of the whole application process. That vote should be a majority vote.a. IP JUSTICE Robin Gross, Executive Director 1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA 94117 USA p: +1-415-553-6261 f: +1-415-462-6451 w: http://www.ipjustice.org e: robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
|