ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[soac-newgtldapsup-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] JAS WG call 5 May

  • To: soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx, Olof Nordling <olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] JAS WG call 5 May
  • From: Richard Tindal <richardtindal@xxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 09:34:19 -0700

All,

I would like to be on WT #1 (Fees)

Richard Tindal


On May 6, 2010, at 9:22 AM, Tijani BEN JEMAA wrote:

> Thank you Olof for the well reported action items.
>  
> I volunteer for the work team # 2 (Who and What), but will also contribute in 
> the WT # 1.
>  
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Tijani BEN JEMAA
> Executive Director
> Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations
> Phone : + 216 71 875 761
> Mobile : + 216 98 330 114
> Fax     : + 216 70 860 861
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>  
> De : owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx] De la part de Olof Nordling
> Envoyé : mercredi 5 mai 2010 17:10
> À : soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> Objet : [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] JAS WG call 5 May
>  
> Dear all,
> Action points from today’s call:
>  
> 1.      FYI, Avri Doria and Evan Leibovitch were unanimously elected 
> co-chairs for the WG – congratulations! And thanks to Rafik for chairing the 
> launch phase!
>  
> 2.      All to review and agree revised version of WG charter (see draft text 
> below, also on the wiki https://st.icann.org/so-ac-new-gtld-wg/index.cgi ) - 
> in time for handling at GNSO Council and ALAC upcoming meetings at 20 and 25 
> May, respectively.
>  
> 3.      Work will proceed in two work teams, for reviewing application fee 
> structure and for “Who and What” (identifying applicants in need of support). 
> Both work teams open for all, using the JAS WG mailing list and the wiki 
> (team headings and some documents/links have been put in the wiki 
> https://st.icann.org/so-ac-new-gtld-wg/index.cgi)
>  
> 4.      Co-chairs and staff will further consider call schedule and call 
> length, proposed agenda for upcoming calls and planning of activities at the 
> ICANN Brussels meeting.
>  
> I think that’s it – did I forget anything?
>  
> All the best
>  
> Olof
> ------------------------
> Revised draft charter as per 5 May
>  
> Preamble: The Joint SO/AC Working Group on New gTLD Applicant Support shall 
> evaluate and propose policy recommendations regarding specific support to new 
> gTLD applicants in justified cases. The working group expects to identify 
> suitable criteria for provision of such support, to identify suitable support 
> forms and to identify potential providers of such support. However, there is 
> no presumption that the outcome will imply any particular governing 
> structure. Accordingly, if the recommendations indicate that the preferred 
> solutions are of a voluntary nature, the criteria and other provisions 
> arrived at in line with the objectives below will solely serve as advice to 
> the parties concerned. The objectives are not listed in any priority order. 
> An overall consideration is that the outcomes of the WG should not lead to 
> delays of the New gTLD process.
>  
> Objective 1: To identify suitable criteria that new gTLD applicants must 
> fulfill to qualify for dedicated support. The criteria may be different for 
> different types of support identified in line with Objective 2 and 3 below.
>  
> Objective 2: To identify how the application fee can be reduced to 
> accommodate applicants that fulfill appropriate criteria to qualify for this 
> benefit.
>  
> Objective 3: To identify what kinds of support (e.g. technical assistance, 
> organizational assistance, financial assistance, fee reduction) and support 
> timelines (e.g. support for the application period only, continuous support) 
> are appropriate for new gTLD applicants fulfilling identified criteria.
>  
> Objective 4: To identify potential providers of the identified kinds of 
> support as well as appropriate mechanisms to enable support provisioning.
>  
> Objective 5: To identify conditions and mechanisms required to minimize the 
> risk of inappropriate access to support.
>  
> Ce message entrant est certifié sans virus connu.
> Analyse effectuée par AVG - www.avg.fr
> Version: 9.0.814 / Base de données virale: 271.1.1/2854 - Date: 05/04/10 
> 19:27:00
> 



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy