ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] JAS WG call 5 May

  • To: <richardtindal@xxxxxx>, <soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx>, <olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] JAS WG call 5 May
  • From: carlos aguirre <carlosaguirre62@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 02:34:05 +0000

I would like to participate in Who and What WT " 2. 

Carlos Dionisio AguirreAbogado - Especialista en Derecho los NegociosSarmiento 
71 - 4to. 18 Cordoba - Argentina -

*54-351-424-2123 / 423-5423


From: richardtindal@xxxxxx
Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] JAS WG call 5 May
Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 09:34:19 -0700
To: soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx; olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx

I would like to be on WT #1 (Fees)
Richard Tindal

On May 6, 2010, at 9:22 AM, Tijani BEN JEMAA wrote:Thank you Olof for the well 
reported action items. I volunteer for the work team # 2 (Who and What), but 
will also contribute in the WT # 1. 
------------------------------------------------------------------Tijani BEN 
JEMAAExecutive DirectorMediterranean Federation of Internet AssociationsPhone : 
+ 216 71 875 761Mobile : + 216 98 330 114Fax     : + 216 70 860 
861------------------------------------------------------------------ De : 
[mailto:owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx] De la part de Olof Nordling
Envoyé : mercredi 5 mai 2010 17:10
À : soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Objet : [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] JAS WG call 5 May Dear all,Action points from 
today’s call: 1.      FYI, Avri Doria and Evan Leibovitch were unanimously 
elected co-chairs for the WG – congratulations! And thanks to Rafik for 
chairing the launch phase! 2.      All to review and agree revised version of 
WG charter (see draft text below, also on the wiki 
https://st.icann.org/so-ac-new-gtld-wg/index.cgi ) - in time for handling at 
GNSO Council and ALAC upcoming meetings at 20 and 25 May, respectively. 3.      
Work will proceed in two work teams, for reviewing application fee structure 
and for “Who and What” (identifying applicants in need of support). Both work 
teams open for all, using the JAS WG mailing list and the wiki (team headings 
and some documents/links have been put in the wiki 
https://st.icann.org/so-ac-new-gtld-wg/index.cgi) 4.      Co-chairs and staff 
will further consider call schedule and call length, proposed agenda for 
upcoming calls and planning of activities at the ICANN Brussels meeting. I 
think that’s it – did I forget anything? All the best 
Olof------------------------Revised draft charter as per 5 May Preamble: The 
Joint SO/AC Working Group on New gTLD Applicant Support shall evaluate and 
propose policy recommendations regarding specific support to new gTLD 
applicants in justified cases. The working group expects to identify suitable 
criteria for provision of such support, to identify suitable support forms and 
to identify potential providers of such support. However, there is no 
presumption that the outcome will imply any particular governing structure. 
Accordingly, if the recommendations indicate that the preferred solutions are 
of a voluntary nature, the criteria and other provisions arrived at in line 
with the objectives below will solely serve as advice to the parties concerned. 
The objectives are not listed in any priority order. An overall consideration 
is that the outcomes of the WG should not lead to delays of the New gTLD 
process. Objective 1: To identify suitable criteria that new gTLD applicants 
must fulfill to qualify for dedicated support. The criteria may be different 
for different types of support identified in line with Objective 2 and 3 below. 
Objective 2: To identify how the application fee can be reduced to accommodate 
applicants that fulfill appropriate criteria to qualify for this benefit. 
Objective 3: To identify what kinds of support (e.g. technical assistance, 
organizational assistance, financial assistance, fee reduction) and support 
timelines (e.g. support for the application period only, continuous support) 
are appropriate for new gTLD applicants fulfilling identified criteria. 
Objective 4: To identify potential providers of the identified kinds of support 
as well as appropriate mechanisms to enable support provisioning. Objective 5: 
To identify conditions and mechanisms required to minimize the risk of 
inappropriate access to support. Ce message entrant est certifié sans virus 
Analyse effectuée par AVG - www.avg.fr
Version: 9.0.814 / Base de données virale: 271.1.1/2854 - Date: 05/04/10 

Registrate en Hotmail y disfrutá de 25 GB para organizar y compartir tus 

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy