<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] JAS WG call 5 May
- To: <richardtindal@xxxxxx>, <soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx>, <olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] JAS WG call 5 May
- From: carlos aguirre <carlosaguirre62@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 02:34:05 +0000
I would like to participate in Who and What WT " 2.
Carlos Dionisio AguirreAbogado - Especialista en Derecho los NegociosSarmiento
71 - 4to. 18 Cordoba - Argentina -
*54-351-424-2123 / 423-5423
http://ar.ageiadensi.org
From: richardtindal@xxxxxx
Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] JAS WG call 5 May
Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 09:34:19 -0700
To: soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx; olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx
All,
I would like to be on WT #1 (Fees)
Richard Tindal
On May 6, 2010, at 9:22 AM, Tijani BEN JEMAA wrote:Thank you Olof for the well
reported action items. I volunteer for the work team # 2 (Who and What), but
will also contribute in the WT # 1.
------------------------------------------------------------------Tijani BEN
JEMAAExecutive DirectorMediterranean Federation of Internet AssociationsPhone :
+ 216 71 875 761Mobile : + 216 98 330 114Fax : + 216 70 860
861------------------------------------------------------------------ De :
owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx] De la part de Olof Nordling
Envoyé : mercredi 5 mai 2010 17:10
À : soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Objet : [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] JAS WG call 5 May Dear all,Action points from
today’s call: 1. FYI, Avri Doria and Evan Leibovitch were unanimously
elected co-chairs for the WG – congratulations! And thanks to Rafik for
chairing the launch phase! 2. All to review and agree revised version of
WG charter (see draft text below, also on the wiki
https://st.icann.org/so-ac-new-gtld-wg/index.cgi ) - in time for handling at
GNSO Council and ALAC upcoming meetings at 20 and 25 May, respectively. 3.
Work will proceed in two work teams, for reviewing application fee structure
and for “Who and What” (identifying applicants in need of support). Both work
teams open for all, using the JAS WG mailing list and the wiki (team headings
and some documents/links have been put in the wiki
https://st.icann.org/so-ac-new-gtld-wg/index.cgi) 4. Co-chairs and staff
will further consider call schedule and call length, proposed agenda for
upcoming calls and planning of activities at the ICANN Brussels meeting. I
think that’s it – did I forget anything? All the best
Olof------------------------Revised draft charter as per 5 May Preamble: The
Joint SO/AC Working Group on New gTLD Applicant Support shall evaluate and
propose policy recommendations regarding specific support to new gTLD
applicants in justified cases. The working group expects to identify suitable
criteria for provision of such support, to identify suitable support forms and
to identify potential providers of such support. However, there is no
presumption that the outcome will imply any particular governing structure.
Accordingly, if the recommendations indicate that the preferred solutions are
of a voluntary nature, the criteria and other provisions arrived at in line
with the objectives below will solely serve as advice to the parties concerned.
The objectives are not listed in any priority order. An overall consideration
is that the outcomes of the WG should not lead to delays of the New gTLD
process. Objective 1: To identify suitable criteria that new gTLD applicants
must fulfill to qualify for dedicated support. The criteria may be different
for different types of support identified in line with Objective 2 and 3 below.
Objective 2: To identify how the application fee can be reduced to accommodate
applicants that fulfill appropriate criteria to qualify for this benefit.
Objective 3: To identify what kinds of support (e.g. technical assistance,
organizational assistance, financial assistance, fee reduction) and support
timelines (e.g. support for the application period only, continuous support)
are appropriate for new gTLD applicants fulfilling identified criteria.
Objective 4: To identify potential providers of the identified kinds of support
as well as appropriate mechanisms to enable support provisioning. Objective 5:
To identify conditions and mechanisms required to minimize the risk of
inappropriate access to support. Ce message entrant est certifié sans virus
connu.
Analyse effectuée par AVG - www.avg.fr
Version: 9.0.814 / Base de données virale: 271.1.1/2854 - Date: 05/04/10
19:27:00
_________________________________________________________________
Registrate en Hotmail y disfrutá de 25 GB para organizar y compartir tus
documentos.
http://mail.live.com/
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|