ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] JAS WG call 5 May

  • To: "Richard Tindal" <richardtindal@xxxxxx>, <soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx>, "Olof Nordling" <olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] JAS WG call 5 May
  • From: "Anthony Harris" <harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 13:52:04 -0300


I volunteer for the "fee structure review" WT.


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Richard Tindal 
  To: soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx ; Olof Nordling 
  Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 1:34 PM
  Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] JAS WG call 5 May


  I would like to be on WT #1 (Fees)

  Richard Tindal

  On May 6, 2010, at 9:22 AM, Tijani BEN JEMAA wrote:

    Thank you Olof for the well reported action items.

    I volunteer for the work team # 2 (Who and What), but will also contribute 
in the WT # 1.

    Tijani BEN JEMAA
    Executive Director
    Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations
    Phone : + 216 71 875 761
    Mobile : + 216 98 330 114
    Fax     : + 216 70 860 861


    De : owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx] De la part de Olof Nordling
    Envoyé : mercredi 5 mai 2010 17:10
    À : soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
    Objet : [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] JAS WG call 5 May

    Dear all,
    Action points from today’s call:

    1.      FYI, Avri Doria and Evan Leibovitch were unanimously elected 
co-chairs for the WG – congratulations! And thanks to Rafik for chairing the 
launch phase!

    2.      All to review and agree revised version of WG charter (see draft 
text below, also on the wiki https://st.icann.org/so-ac-new-gtld-wg/index.cgi ) 
- in time for handling at GNSO Council and ALAC upcoming meetings at 20 and 25 
May, respectively.

    3.      Work will proceed in two work teams, for reviewing application fee 
structure and for “Who and What” (identifying applicants in need of support). 
Both work teams open for all, using the JAS WG mailing list and the wiki (team 
headings and some documents/links have been put in the wiki 

    4.      Co-chairs and staff will further consider call schedule and call 
length, proposed agenda for upcoming calls and planning of activities at the 
ICANN Brussels meeting.

    I think that’s it – did I forget anything?

    All the best

    Revised draft charter as per 5 May

    Preamble: The Joint SO/AC Working Group on New gTLD Applicant Support shall 
evaluate and propose policy recommendations regarding specific support to new 
gTLD applicants in justified cases. The working group expects to identify 
suitable criteria for provision of such support, to identify suitable support 
forms and to identify potential providers of such support. However, there is no 
presumption that the outcome will imply any particular governing structure. 
Accordingly, if the recommendations indicate that the preferred solutions are 
of a voluntary nature, the criteria and other provisions arrived at in line 
with the objectives below will solely serve as advice to the parties concerned. 
The objectives are not listed in any priority order. An overall consideration 
is that the outcomes of the WG should not lead to delays of the New gTLD 

    Objective 1: To identify suitable criteria that new gTLD applicants must 
fulfill to qualify for dedicated support. The criteria may be different for 
different types of support identified in line with Objective 2 and 3 below.

    Objective 2: To identify how the application fee can be reduced to 
accommodate applicants that fulfill appropriate criteria to qualify for this 

    Objective 3: To identify what kinds of support (e.g. technical assistance, 
organizational assistance, financial assistance, fee reduction) and support 
timelines (e.g. support for the application period only, continuous support) 
are appropriate for new gTLD applicants fulfilling identified criteria.

    Objective 4: To identify potential providers of the identified kinds of 
support as well as appropriate mechanisms to enable support provisioning.

    Objective 5: To identify conditions and mechanisms required to minimize the 
risk of inappropriate access to support.

    Ce message entrant est certifié sans virus connu.
    Analyse effectuée par AVG - www.avg.fr
    Version: 9.0.814 / Base de données virale: 271.1.1/2854 - Date: 05/04/10 

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy