Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] JAS WG call 5 May

[Andrew Mack <amack@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I would like to do the same as Tijani, with most of my emphasis on the "Who and 
What" group.

Thank you, Andrew

 
Andrew A. Mack 
Principal
AMGlobal Consulting
+1-202-256-1077  
amack@xxxxxxxxxxxx  
www.amglobal.com




________________________________
From: Tijani BEN JEMAA <tijani.benjemaa@xxxxxxxx>
To: soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Olof Nordling <olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thu, May 6, 2010 12:22:57 PM
Subject: RE: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] JAS WG call 5 May

 
Thank you Olof for the well
reported action items.
 
I volunteer for the work
team # 2 (Who and What), but will also contribute in the WT # 1. 
 
------------------------------------------------------------------
Tijani BEN JEMAA
Executive
Director 
Mediterranean Federation
ofInternet Associations
Phone : + 216 71 875
761
Mobile : + 216 98 330 114
Fax     :+ 216 70 860
861
------------------------------------------------------------------
 

________________________________
 
De :owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx] De
la part de Olof Nordling
Envoyé : mercredi 5 mai 2010
17:10
À : soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Objet : [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] JAS WG call 5 May
 
Dear all,
Action points from today’s call:
 
1.      FYI, Avri Doria and Evan Leibovitch were unanimously
elected co-chairs for the WG – congratulations! And thanks to Rafik for
chairing the launch phase!
 
2.      All to review and agree revised version of WG charter
(see draft text below, also on the wiki 
https://st.icann.org/so-ac-new-gtld-wg/index.cgi ) - in time for handling at 
GNSO Council and ALAC upcoming meetings at 20 and
25 May, respectively.
 
3.      Work will proceed in two work teams, for reviewing
application fee structure and for “Who and What” (identifying
applicants in need of support). Both work teams open for all, using the JAS WG
mailing list and the wiki (team headings and some documents/links have been put
in the wiki https://st.icann.org/so-ac-new-gtld-wg/index.cgi) 
 
4.      Co-chairs and staff will further consider call
schedule and call length, proposed agenda for upcoming calls and planning of
activities at the ICANN Brussels meeting.
 
I think that’s it – did I forget anything?
 
All the best
 
Olof
------------------------ 
Revised draft charter as per 5 May
 
Preamble: The Joint SO/AC Working Group on New gTLD Applicant Support
shall evaluate and propose policy recommendations regarding specific support to
new gTLD applicants in justified cases. The working group expects to identify
suitable criteria for provision of such support, to identify suitable support 
forms
and to identify potential providers of such support. However, there is no
presumption that the outcome will imply any particular governing structure.
Accordingly, if the recommendations indicate that the preferred solutions are
of a voluntary nature, the criteria and other provisions arrived at in line
with the objectives below will solely serve as advice to the parties concerned.
The objectives are not listed in any priority order. An overall consideration
is that the outcomes of the WG should not lead to delays of the New gTLD
process.
 
Objective 1: To identify suitable criteria that new gTLD applicants
must fulfill to qualify for dedicated support. The criteria may be different
for different types of support identified in line with Objective 2 and 3 below.
 
Objective 2: To identify how the application fee can be reduced to
accommodate applicants that fulfill appropriate criteria to qualify for this
benefit.
 
Objective 3: To identify what kinds of support (e.g. technical
assistance, organizational assistance, financial assistance, fee reduction) and
support timelines (e.g. support for the application period only, continuous
support) are appropriate for new gTLD applicants fulfilling identified
criteria.
 
Objective 4: To identify potential providers of the identified kinds of
support as well as appropriate mechanisms to enable support provisioning.
 
Objective 5: To identify conditions and mechanisms required to minimize
the risk of inappropriate access to support.
 
Ce message entrant est certifié sans virus connu.
Analyse effectuée par AVG - www.avg.fr
Version: 9.0.814 / Base de données virale: 271.1.1/2854 - Date: 05/04/10 
19:27:00