Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Issue for WT2?

[Richard Tindal <richardtindal@xxxxxx>]

Avri,

Would you put DNSSEC in a similar category of difficulty for local registry 
services?

RT


On May 16, 2010, at 3:49 AM, Avri Doria wrote:

> 
> Hi,
> 
> I was rereading DAGv3 and noticed something I had not paid attention to 
> before (there really is a lot in there)
> 
> 5.2.2
> 
>> IPv6 support -- Applicant must provision IPv6 service for its
>> DNS infrastructure. ICANN will review the self-certification
>> documentation provided by the applicant and will test
>> IPv6 reachability from various points on the Internet. DNS
>> transaction capacity over IPv6 for all name servers with
>> declared IPv6 addresses will also be checked.
> 
> I am now wondering how many people, especially in developing regions, are 
> going to be prevented from starting a Registry - with local registry service 
> support - on that basis.  I  know they don't need their own registry 
> services, the can continue to use the processing power of the incumbents and 
> just bring them the domain names.  But if they want to run their own RSP, how 
> can they - what solutions are there?
> 
> I also wonder though whether this would count as one of the items people 
> would need technical assistance with - i.e. coming up with ways to meet this 
> requirement even in areas where there is no native IPv6 support (can IPv4 
> tunneling techniques be used - and who will provide the support for this - or 
> the endpoint)?
> 
> Perhaps ICANN has already thought of this and it is something that they 
> intend to advise people on.
> 
> a.
> 
> 
> 
>