Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Issue for WT2?

[Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Richard,

I think that is about all technical requirements which should differ between
registries, a registry running thousands of domains for community and
registry running millions .
maybe we need to look on details about the technical part in DAGv3 and
define what kind of technical assistance which can respond to that or maybe
in extreme case we may recommend that some requirements can be optional
regarding the RSP size.

Regards

Rafik

2010/5/17 Richard Tindal <richardtindal@xxxxxx>

>
> Avri,
>
> Would you put DNSSEC in a similar category of difficulty for local registry
> services?
>
> RT
>
>
> On May 16, 2010, at 3:49 AM, Avri Doria wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was rereading DAGv3 and noticed something I had not paid attention to
> before (there really is a lot in there)
> >
> > 5.2.2
> >
> >> IPv6 support -- Applicant must provision IPv6 service for its
> >> DNS infrastructure. ICANN will review the self-certification
> >> documentation provided by the applicant and will test
> >> IPv6 reachability from various points on the Internet. DNS
> >> transaction capacity over IPv6 for all name servers with
> >> declared IPv6 addresses will also be checked.
> >
> > I am now wondering how many people, especially in developing regions, are
> going to be prevented from starting a Registry - with local registry service
> support - on that basis.  I  know they don't need their own registry
> services, the can continue to use the processing power of the incumbents and
> just bring them the domain names.  But if they want to run their own RSP,
> how can they - what solutions are there?
> >
> > I also wonder though whether this would count as one of the items people
> would need technical assistance with - i.e. coming up with ways to meet this
> requirement even in areas where there is no native IPv6 support (can IPv4
> tunneling techniques be used - and who will provide the support for this -
> or the endpoint)?
> >
> > Perhaps ICANN has already thought of this and it is something that they
> intend to advise people on.
> >
> > a.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>