<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] TEXT FOR DISCUSSION WT-1
- To: "Tijani BEN JEMAA" <tijani.benjemaa@xxxxxxxx>, "'Michele Neylon :: Blacknight'" <michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Alex Gakuru'" <gakuru@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] TEXT FOR DISCUSSION WT-1
- From: "Anthony Harris" <harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 15:23:17 -0300
I support this suggestion,
Tony Harris
----- Original Message -----
From: Tijani BEN JEMAA
To: 'Michele Neylon :: Blacknight' ; 'Alex Gakuru'
Cc: 'Anthony Harris' ; soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 2:40 PM
Subject: RE: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] TEXT FOR DISCUSSION WT-1
> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010, Michele Neylon :: Blacknight
<michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On 1 Jun 2010, Alex Gakuru wrote:
>>
>> I believe we should make all the recommendations the WG feels would be
>> beneficial for the target applicants then leave the board to adopt or
>> reject as per their best judgement.
> Exactly
That's our mission, and that's what we are asked to do. Let's draft what we
are convinced that it's the best solution for the concerned applicants
regardless any other consideration except the Resolution 20, which is our
reference document.
Tijani
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|