Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] TEXT FOR DISCUSSION WT-1

[Richard Tindal <richardtindal@xxxxxx>]

Hi Tijani,

Are you saying the Board specifically intended to exclude the development and 
risk cost components?

Or are you making a more semantic argument that their exact words don't 
encompass those categories?

Richard


On Jun 1, 2010, at 2:10 PM, Tijani BEN JEMAA wrote:

> Dear Tony,
>  
> Thanks again for your input.
>  
> I wanted to highlight that the Board resolution 20 spoke about the recovery 
> of application and on-going costs only. The development and risk costs can’t 
> be part of those costs.
> Now we have to find how the application and on-going costs can be paid 
> progressively for the categories WT2 will define, and finally, define the 
> support to be provided for them.
>  
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Tijani BEN JEMAA
> Executive Director
> Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations
> Phone : + 216 70 825 231
> Mobile : + 216 98 330 114
> Fax     : + 216 70 825 231
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>  
> De : owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx] De la part de Anthony Harris
> Envoyé : lundi 31 mai 2010 21:12
> À : soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> Objet : [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] TEXT FOR DISCUSSION WT-1
>  
> Dear all,
>  
> Please find attached text that may serve as a springboard
> for our discussion tomorrow.
>  
> Regards
>  
> Tony Harris
> Ce message entrant est certifié sans virus connu.
> Analyse effectuée par AVG - www.avg.fr
> Version: 9.0.819 / Base de données virale: 271.1.1/2909 - Date: 05/31/10 
> 19:25:00
> 
>