<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] JAS WG - The "snapshot" text
- To: soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] JAS WG - The "snapshot" text
- From: Richard Tindal <richardtindal@xxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 19:54:04 +0200
i dont think we should set rules about community size
RT
On Jun 14, 2010, at 7:47 PM, Elaine Pruis wrote:
> I do have a question on the text under WT2,
>
> "Q: Is there a minimum number of people in a community needed to create
> “critical mass” for viability? A: There was extensive discussion around this,
> but no consensus. It is hoped that new business models will emerge
> specifically for work with smaller communities."
>
> It is my recollection that we concluded not to require a minimum number in a
> community ?
>
> Is there a diverging opinion?
>
> Thanks
>
> Elaine
>
>
>
> On Jun 14, 2010, at 5:20 AM, Olof Nordling wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>> In preparation for tomorrow’s call, please find as attachment the full text
>> of the “snapshot” for posting, as currently drafted on the Wiki. Noting that
>> there has been precious little drafting on the Wiki (actually none, except
>> by yours truly), I thought it might be helpful for you to have the text as a
>> Word document as well.
>> Remember – our task is to finalize the text for posting tomorrow, so please
>> read and propose any edits you suggest/prefer/require, preferably on the
>> list before tomorrow’s call.
>> Thanks
>> Olof
>> <Snapshot.doc>
>
> Elaine Pruis
> VP Client Services
> elaine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> +1 509 899 3161
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|