ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[soac-newgtldapsup-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] JAS WG - The "snapshot" text

  • To: soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] JAS WG - The "snapshot" text
  • From: Richard Tindal <richardtindal@xxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 19:54:04 +0200

i dont think we should set rules about community size

RT



On Jun 14, 2010, at 7:47 PM, Elaine Pruis wrote:

> I do have a question on the text under WT2, 
> 
> "Q: Is there a minimum number of people in a community needed to create 
> “critical mass” for viability? A: There was extensive discussion around this, 
> but no consensus. It is hoped that new business models will emerge 
> specifically for work with smaller communities."
> 
> It is my recollection that we concluded not to require a minimum number in a 
> community ?
> 
> Is there a diverging opinion?
> 
> Thanks 
> 
> Elaine
> 
> 
> 
> On Jun 14, 2010, at 5:20 AM, Olof Nordling wrote:
> 
>> Dear all,
>> In preparation for tomorrow’s call, please find as attachment the full text 
>> of the “snapshot” for posting, as currently drafted on the Wiki. Noting that 
>> there has been precious little drafting on the Wiki (actually none, except 
>> by yours truly), I thought it might be helpful for you to have the text as a 
>> Word document as well.
>> Remember – our task is to finalize the text for posting tomorrow, so please 
>> read and propose any edits you suggest/prefer/require, preferably on the 
>> list before tomorrow’s call.
>> Thanks
>> Olof
>> <Snapshot.doc>
> 
> Elaine Pruis
> VP Client Services
> elaine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> +1 509 899 3161
> 



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy