Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] JAS WG - The "snapshot" text

[Andrew Mack <amack@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Elaine,

Both are true.  There was no consensus per se as to what number of people would 
make critical mass, but we did agree not to formally recommend/require a 
minimum number, you are right.  I'm happy to change this or have it changed.

Cheers, Andrew

 
Andrew A. Mack 
Principal
AMGlobal Consulting
+1-202-256-1077  
amack@xxxxxxxxxxxx  
www.amglobal.com




________________________________
From: Elaine Pruis <elaine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Olof Nordling <olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Mon, June 14, 2010 1:47:58 PM
Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] JAS WG - The "snapshot" text

I do have a question on the text under WT2, 

"Q: Is there a minimum number of people in a community needed to create
“critical mass” for viability? A: There was extensive discussion around
this, but no consensus. It is hoped that new business models will
emerge specifically for work with smaller communities."

It is my recollection that we concluded not to require a minimum number in a 
community ?

Is there a diverging opinion?

Thanks 

Elaine




On Jun 14, 2010, at 5:20 AM, Olof Nordling wrote:

Dear all,
>In preparation for tomorrow’s call, please find as attachment the full text of 
>the “snapshot” for posting, as currently drafted on the Wiki. Noting that 
>there has been precious little drafting on the Wiki (actually none, except by 
>yours truly), I thought it might be helpful for you to have the text as a Word 
>document as well.
>Remember – our task is to finalize the text for posting tomorrow, so please 
>read and propose any edits you suggest/prefer/require, preferably on the list 
>before tomorrow’s call.
>Thanks
>Olof<Snapshot.doc>

Elaine Pruis
VP Client Services
elaine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
+1 509 899 3161