<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Some comments/questions for our call
- To: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>, "SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Some comments/questions for our call
- From: Karla Valente <karla.valente@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 18:03:25 -0700
Dear Avri:
Just to clarify: IPv6 is still a requirement (question 32 in the application).
Maybe the confusion is the pre-delegation testing -- IPv6 capabilities are
embedded into multiple testing areas; this was a change from previous versions
where IPv6 was specified as an individual test element.
Makes sense?
Karla
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 11:14 AM
To: SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Some comments/questions for our call
On 2 Aug 2010, at 11:48, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
> The IPv6 requirement is no longer mandatory in DAGv4, so as a cost and
> complexity item, it is now at the discretion of the applicant.
thanks for pointing this out. i had missed its absence in reading the latest
version of the application guide.
a.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|