<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Question 2: the funding exception rule
- To: soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Question 2: the funding exception rule
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 18:11:27 -0400
Hi,
During the last meeting we had a discussion that I do not believe resolved on
the percentage of funding that an applicant had to bring to the table.
The current snapshot says 50%.
Among the questions asked:
- why 50%?
- is this a strict boundary?
- can there be exceptions?
- where does the other 50% need to come from?
On this last question an example might work. A friend of mine had problems
paying her rent in NYC. The city has a plan to fund part of the rent of a
person who is threatened with eviction and is poor enough - they will match
dollar for dollar on the amount of money in arrears - i.e. will got up to 50%.
In this case my friend built a package that included 3 charities and a bunch of
friends and family to meet 50% of her debt. And the city matched it.
Do we care where the applicant gets the first 50%?
In any case this section of the report needed some rework.
thanks
a.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|