Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Question 2: the funding exception rule

[Baudouin SCHOMBE <b.schombe@xxxxxxxxx>]

This question deserves to be sufficiently clarified in terms of sales and
process, more particularly, to enlighten us.
-For which is 50%, we can understand that it is an effort to do;
-For the other 50% I do not think that the example of Avri may be possible
in Africa.
We must find another formula. That is what we think.
Tijani Contributions in these debates are relevant here and that is our
support.

SCHOMBE BAUDOUIN



2010/8/30 Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>

>
> Hi,
>
> During the last meeting we had a discussion that I do not believe resolved
> on the percentage of funding that an applicant had to bring to the table.
>
> The current snapshot says 50%.
>
> Among the questions asked:
>
> - why 50%?
> - is this a strict boundary?
> - can there be exceptions?
> - where does the other 50% need to come from?
>
> On this last question an example might work.  A friend of mine had problems
> paying her rent in NYC.  The city has a plan to fund part of the rent of a
> person who is threatened with eviction and is poor enough - they will match
> dollar for dollar on the amount of money in arrears - i.e. will got up to
> 50%.  In this case my friend built a package that included 3 charities and a
> bunch of friends and family to meet 50% of her debt.  And the city matched
> it.
>
> Do we care where the applicant gets the first 50%?
>
> In any case this section of the report needed some rework.
>
> thanks
>
> a.
>
>
>