RE: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Question 1: Size of applicant pool for support

["Tijani BEN JEMAA" <tijani.benjemaa@xxxxxxxx>]

Avri,

 

For this particular issue, there was consensus during the 2 calls of last
week (for people who attended) and on the list (a lot of support: plz review
the messages on the list).

 

But I will not argue again, and ask clearly to ask the whole list members to
comment on the whole available text, so that those who are not ok with it
can express themselves. 

 

When you say that no consensus was reached on any of the part of the report,
I feel we wasted our time in discussing at length issues and put together
text for them, and Karla send the result on the list and ask to correct her
if she is wrong, and no objection raised, and yet, you say there is no
consensus?????

 

 

------------------------------------------------------------------

Tijani BEN JEMAA

Executive Director 

Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations

Phone : + 216 70 825 231

Mobile : + 216 98 330 114

Fax     : + 216 70 825 231

------------------------------------------------------------------

 

-----Message d'origine-----
De : owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx] De la part de Avri Doria
Envoyé : mardi 31 août 2010 12:26
À : soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Objet : Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Question 1: Size of applicant pool for
support

 

 

Hi,

 

It was debated extensively, but I do not yet perceive the consensus.  Hence
my question.  I mentioned during the meeting that I would be sending out the
question.

 

a.

 

On 31 Aug 2010, at 03:51, Tijani BEN JEMAA wrote:

 

> Hi Avri,

>  

> This issue was debated in length, and we finally decided in the 2 last
calls not to restrict the support to only one category. It was a consensus.
The pool seize will be will determined by the resources available, but not
by an arbitrary decision of our WG to exclude all the categories except one.
The consensus was that applicants meeting one of the a to e criteria (with
no preference order) plus the main one which is the need are eligible.

>  

> ------------------------------------------------------------------

> Tijani BEN JEMAA

> Executive Director

> Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations

> Phone : + 216 70 825 231

> Mobile : + 216 98 330 114

> Fax     : + 216 70 825 231

> ------------------------------------------------------------------

>  

> -----Message d'origine-----

> De : owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx] De la part de Avri Doria

> Envoyé : lundi 30 août 2010 23:04

> À : soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx

> Objet : [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Question 1: Size of applicant pool for
support

>  

>  

> Hi,

>  

> I was supposed to send this message out on Friday.  Apologies.

>  

> An open issue that needs to be resolved before getting back to
word-smithing  of the final report is to what degree do we want to restrict
the pool of applicants eligible for whatever assistance we can muster up.
Also referred to as the size of the funnel in the call.

>  

> We currently have a proposal that:

>  

> a. first judges need

> b. then if there is need, as long as you meet conditions a-e  you get
assistance.

>  

> The process in the snapshot said:

>  

> If you meet conditions A and have need you get support.

>  

> Obviously the pool of possible applicants is larger in the proposal than
in the snapshot.

>  

> In deciding to move toward this proposal and away from the situation as
documented in the snapshot, we need to determine whether:

>  

> a. this change is in response to a strong call by the comments

> b. this change is favored by a consensus in the group.

>  

> I don't know the answer to either of those questions yet.

>  

> What do people think?

>  

> a.

>  

>  

>  

>  

>