Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] On Vertical Integration

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

Personal view, even though I am one of those tagged as being in favor of 
separation exceptions:

I think we should keep the topics separate and should not try to grant 
separation exceptions on the basis of need.  That may come from the VIWG, in 
terms of orphan clauses and whatever, but I think we should avoid the topic 
like a plague in this group.

a.

On 7 Sep 2010, at 19:40, Michele Neylon :: Blacknight wrote:

> 
> 
> On 7 Sep 2010, at 17:26, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
> 
>> Fine, though I'd settle for your own thoughts on the problem.
>> 
>> Two applicants, both alike in dignity,
>> In fair Verona, where we lay our scene,
>> ...
>> 
>> One manifests the existence of "need", one manifests the absence of "need".
>> 
>> In all other respects, the applications are indistinguishable.
>> 
>> Do you support an exception to the Vertical Separation requirement that is 
>> only available to the applicant which manifests "need"?
>> 
>> Eric
> 
> Eric
> 
> But you're assuming that I support "separation" :) 
> 
> I've always thought the entire VI thing was a great big waste of everyone's 
> time ..
> 
> In the ccTLD world there are plenty of variations and they can all work .. 
> 
> Regards
> 
> Michele
> 
> 
> 
> Mr Michele Neylon
> Blacknight Solutions
> Hosting & Colocation, Brand Protection
> ICANN Accredited Registrar
> http://www.blacknight.com/
> http://blog.blacknight.com/
> http://blacknight.mobi/
> http://mneylon.tel
> Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072
> US: 213-233-1612 
> UK: 0844 484 9361
> Locall: 1850 929 929
> Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/mneylon
> 
> PS: Check out our latest offers on domains & hosting: http://domainoffers.me/
> -------------------------------
> Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
> Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland  Company No.: 370845
> 
>