<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Board resolution during retreat regarding Applicant Support
- To: "'SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx'" <soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Board resolution during retreat regarding Applicant Support
- From: Sébastien Bachollet <sebastien@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 12:36:54 +0200
Hi,
I will not say a new board but some new board members 3 of 14 or maybe 4 of
15 ;)
But yes it can make the difference.
Sébastien Bachollet
sebastien@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
+33 6 07 66 89 33
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-soac-
> newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx] De la part de Avri Doria
> Envoyé : lundi 27 septembre 2010 22:46
> À : SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> Objet : Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Board resolution during retreat
> regarding Applicant Support
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I see absolutely no reason to make that assumption. This group has
> been chartered by the ALAC and the GNSO council and there is every
> reason to believe we will continue to receive support to complete our
> work. Of course our liaisons can correct me if I am wrong.
>
> And even in the worst case about the Board's response, they would, I am
> positive, support the work for the future rounds.
>
> In the meantime, I do not assume that the Board's decisions are
> immutable. By projecting a new DAG in Cartagena, we can now be fairly
> certain that it will be a new Board that will approve the final AG
> sometime in 2011. There is no reason to quit trying.
>
> a.
>
> On 27 Sep 2010, at 15:55, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
>
> > At this point, given the limited area of what policy the Board has
> expressed a willingness to entertain, I expect staff resources, and the
> bridge and mailing list, adobe and wiki resources to be curtailed.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|