RE: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Board resolution

[carlos dionisio aguirre <carlosaguirre62@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dear All.

In relation with this issue, I propose give end and send our work (the final 
statement of the WG) to chartering organizations to get their definitive 
support.

Next, jump in the new tasks given by  board resolutions on 2010-10-28.

It seems to me, at least is that I can see. the Board had not, at the moment to 
take resolutions, a complete idea about our proposals. 

And on this sense is our work make to know this, for this I believe we need to 
send our final statement after be approved by chartering organizations and 
ASAP, and if it possible explain the why of our position.

Carlos Dionisio Aguirre
ALAC member by LACRALO - ICANN
Abogado - Especialista en Derecho de los Negocios
Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Cordoba - Argentina -
*54-351-424-2123 / 423-5423
http://ar.ageiadensi.org 




> Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Board resolution
> From: avri@xxxxxxx
> Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 12:37:20 -0400
> To: soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Thnks for sending this.
> 
> I think we need those extensions to our charter from the chartering 
> organizations as soon as possible.
> 
> I also suggest we still submit our Milestone report/comment repsonse ASAP and 
> get on with the next stage.
> 
> Given the schedule that was put out, which Eric sent, I think it would be 
> good it we managed to finish the basic work in a month.
> 
> I do not propose waiting for the chartering organizations for us to start, 
> rather, I think we should close the discussions on the current documents, 
> send them off and jump right in do defining how we want to continue with the 
> task at hand.
> 
> I actually feel somewhat heartened.
> 
> a.
> 
> 
> On 29 Oct 2010, at 23:33, Rafik Dammak wrote:
> 
> > Hello Everyone,
> > 
> > I just saw the last board resolution related to our work, I am not sure if 
> > you already discussed about as I joined late and couldn't attend the whole 
> > confcall. regarding the board material, as I said I will bring the topic 
> > top GNSO council land will coordinate with co-chairs in that matter.
> > 
> > Rafik
> > 
> > New gTLD Applicant Support
> > Whereas, the Board at its March 2010 meeting in Nairobi, Kenya, passed 
> > resolutions recognizing the importance of an inclusive New gTLD Program, 
> > and requesting stakeholders to form a Working Group to develop sustainable 
> > support needy applicants for new gTLDs;
> > 
> > Whereas ALAC and the GNSO Council, in response to the Nairobi Board 
> > resolutions, formed a Joint Supporting Organization/Advisory Committee 
> > (SO/AC) Working Group on New gTLD Applicant Support (the JAS WG);
> > 
> > Whereas the JAS WG worked with various stakeholders and presented a report 
> > on their findings and recommendations to the Board, and the Board also 
> > received a statement on the matter from the African community;
> > 
> > Whereas the Board, at its September, 2010 meeting in Trondheim, Norway, 
> > made some statements on providing needy applicants with support such as 
> > outreach and education, and matching them with sources of support;
> > 
> > Whereas the Board, along the lines of its Nairobi meeting resolutions, is 
> > still committed to working with the community to ensure an inclusive new 
> > gTLD program;
> > 
> > RESOLVED (2010.10.28.20), the Board thanks the JAS WG and those members of 
> > the community who have devoted their time and energy on finding sustainable 
> > ways to support needy applicants for new gTLDs.
> > 
> > RESOLVED (2010.10.28.21), the Board encourages the JAS WG and other 
> > stakeholders to continue their work on the matter, and in particular, 
> > provide specific guidelines on the implementation of their recommendations 
> > such as determining the criteria for eligibility for support.
> > 
> > RESOLVED (2010.10.28.22), the Board further stresses that any needy 
> > applicant support program must have a sustainable funding model that may be 
> > independent of ICANN and can be implemented transparently, and effectively 
> > to the benefit of the global Internet community.
> > 
> 
>