Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] proposal for JAS session - Thursday 9 - 10 AM EDT

[Elaine Pruis <elaine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Karla,

Yes a brief intro and overview are necessary. I like asking for input after 
each slide-as long as we don't get stuck and fail to complete the presentation.

Mostly I don't want our working group to spend 90% of the time talking. <50% 
would be more productive for all in my opinion.

Cheers

Elaine


On Nov 30, 2010, at 12:22 PM, Karla Valente <karla.valente@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Elaine,
> 
> Here are my 5 cents....publicized is not the same as understood. I take this 
> from my personal experience on how much people actually DO NOT read materials 
> posted and kind of questions I get. I also recommend, regardless of who is 
> presenting, that there is a small intro to explain:
> Why are we doing this?
> Why is the important?
> What does it mean to the applicant guidebook and launch timeline?
> 
> I would also have few pre-set questions/topics for discussion or maybe ask 
> audience questions after each slide... 
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Karla Valente
> +1 310 936 4639  
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Elaine Pruis
> Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 10:40 AM
> To: Avri Doria
> Cc: soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] proposal for JAS session - Thursday 9 - 
> 10 AM EDT
> 
> 
> I like this plan; it echoes Tijani's suggestion.
> 
> I would much rather spend our time hearing from the audience and discussing 
> future work than have a panel of WG members reiterate what is  already widely 
> publicized.
> 
> Some of you may recall PDT's "talk show" format for a session in LA several 
> years ago. It worked and was an interesting way to engage the audience.
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Elaine
> 
> 
> On Nov 30, 2010, at 8:09 AM, Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> hi,
>> 
>> Here is my proposal for how the session is run.  Alternate proposal are of 
>> course welcome and the group can decide.
>> 
>> I am proposing that his is not a panel discussion, but rather a report and 
>> dialogue.  I believe need to do the following in the hour:
>> 
>> - raise awareness of what has been done
>> - raise awareness of what needs to be done
>> - give people a view into the continuing conversations on details
>> - open up to feedback and advice
>> - get support and more involvement
>> 
>> Agenda for the meeting - keeping it simple and using as little time as 
>> necessary for meeting overhead:
>> 
>> - If it fits his schedule it would be good to get Sebastien as  member who s 
>> not on the Board to give a quick intro on the importance of the work.
>> 
>> - Either Evan on I give the presentation with frequent opportunities for 
>> conversation from the floor, including amplifications by JAS Wg members, 
>> questions/comments form others.  Either Evan or I (i.e the other one) 
>> moderates the floor discussion, keeps it moving and limits the time people 
>> speak.
>> 
>> - We end with the status of the charter renewal and with an appeal for 
>> people to comment formally on the report and to get involved
>> 
>> a.
>> 
>> 
>