[soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Isssue notes

[Eric Brunner-Williams <ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Colleagues,

There are issues that either appear to be at the periphery of what we 
collectively think are "in scope" for this WG, or which have been 
brought to our attention as a result of changes in the DAG and 
surrounding circumstances.
I propose that those who want to contribute an "issue note" on any 
issue, whether simply to clarify the issues or to advocate for the 
issue being "in scope" or "not in scope", do so.
This will allow us a means to gather information on an issue, and 
dispose of it, without making each an agenda item, possibly prematurely.
As an example of an issue that is "close" to what we collectively 
think is "in scope" are the choices associated with the continuity 
instrument (escrow account in the current DAG).
As an example of an issue that is "novel" to us is if some part of the 
community evaluation reduces the viability of applications that are 
needs-qualified for assistance.
The alternative is minority statements external to any consensus 
report, which puts discussion after the point at which the report is 
framed and the personal time investment of wordsmithing is committed.
Eric