<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] FW: JAS WG Milestone - response and recommendation
- To: Tijani BEN JEMAA <tijani.benjemaa@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] FW: JAS WG Milestone - response and recommendation
- From: Eric Brunner-Williams <ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 07:06:05 -0500
Colleagues,
I concur with Tijani that the issue of applicants located in _least_
developed economies/countries has been considered, along with the
issue of applicants located in developing economies/countries.
I also concur with Tijani that "Entrepreneurs/SME's in Green
Technology Solutions" is out of scope.
Having been personally involved in the effort to deliver the most
needed aid to keep the Haitian network -- governmental, NGO, and
private components -- operational during days 4 to 14 after last
year's quake -- unglamorous diesel fuel for the generators at the
Boutillier Hill NAP, which powered the only surviving link, the
microwave relay to the DR, I reached the conclusion that the mode of
energy, "green" or some other color, is irrelevant to the momentary
operational requirements of internet infrastructure providers.
Some in the responder community advocated a change of technology, with
"green" as a component of the proposed technologies, as the central
element of the response, and many NGOs in place prior to the event
used alternate technology (typically VSAT links to some NAP,
restricted wireless or wireline, and solar/generator/battery power at
the point of service). However, every kilometer of wireline
infrastructure repaired delivered power and voice/data to all
surviving structures and temporary camps passed by the repaired
infrastructure, and most closely conformed to the momentary and most
likely medium and long-term habitation, business and governmental
situation on the ground.
The choice, made by the affected parties, not the responder community,
to repair, not replace, the existing data wireline infrastructure and
its non-green electrical dependency, as well as the non-green power
distribution network (adjacent cable infrastructure), was, and
remains, in my opinion, the better engineering choice.
A "green technology" may be relevant to the sustained operational
requirements of internet infrastructure providers, in the long run,
but our problem is the problem of the start-up.
Eric
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|