<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] GAC-Board Intersessional, a JAS observer
- To: "soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] GAC-Board Intersessional, a JAS observer
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 10:14:41 -0500
Hi,
Good idea.
I am not suggesting it be me, but since i will be in the 'neighborhood' for the
IGF meeting the week before, i have applied for an observer's seat.
JAS is one of my two concerns in being there. The other is Rec6. I will
definitely lobby for JAS and will report anything back to the group, if I am
granted one of the seats. Since I will probably have to buy a ticket before
they make the decision about who gets a seat in the meeting, I will probably be
there anyway, either listening remotely from outside the room, or inside the
room.
a.
On 4 Feb 2011, at 09:15, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
>
> Colleagues,
>
> I suggest that designating an observer to this meeting could assist the
> parties, who may be otherwise distracted by other issues and their advocates,
> in scheduling some time and meeting resources to the implementation details
> of Resolution 20.
>
> Eric
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|