<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] IDN proposal language
- To: "soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] IDN proposal language
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 00:22:01 +0200
I agree.
a.
On 13 Apr 2011, at 00:09, Tijani BEN JEMAA wrote:
> Dear Andrew,
>
> Yes for encouraging the underserved languages on the net, but, as you already
> know, I can’t support assistance for a second or third string.
>
> I want to remind that our main mission is to develop a sustainable approach
> to providing support to applicants requiring assistance in applying for and
> operating new gTLDs.
>
> We have to support the IDN applications, and that’s why we put them in the
> milestone report as one of the categories to be eligible for support.
>
> I already told you that I’m ready to sign a statement supporting fee
> reduction for an application for multiple language strings because it will
> encourage the introduction of underserved languages in the root, and doesn’t
> cost so much for ICANN. But I can’t support it in the JAS WG. It will dilute
> our work, and make us appear as if we are asking for support for the net
> industry.
> How can we support application for multiple strings while some are not able
> to apply for a single one? We need to convince the others and especially the
> Board members.
>
> We had this long discussion in the first phase of our work, and we reached
> the following in our milestone report:
> 2.2.1 Support for Build-out in Underserved Languages and Scripts
> Subject to the requirements for receiving support from the program, the WG
> had Consensus that price reductions should be implemented to encourage the
> build out of Internationalized Domain Names (IDNs) in small or underserved
> languages, with the exact amount and timing of the support to be determined.
> One way this might be accomplished is through bundling of applications.
>
> a) There was Consensus for requiring that each application requesting such
> support have explicit endorsement from within the language community to be
> served. This support must come from organizations, NGOs and/or local
> companies from within the language/script community. The lead applicant would
> not, necessarily, need to be from the community to be served assuming other
> conditions for support were met.
>
> b) There was a Minority View that applicants who may not meet the need
> requirement for support but who have explicit endorsement from within the
> language community to be served should also be able to receive some form of
> support, for example bundling discounts, in order to offer these services to
> the underserved language/script community. This community endorsement must
> come from organizations, Non Governmental Organizations (NGOs) and/or local
> companies from within the language/script community.
>
> There was Full Consensus that this form of support should encourage the
> advancement of the language community while also encouraging competition to
> the greatest extent possible.
>
> 2.8 Applicants Entitled To Receive Support
>
> · Full Consensus: Applications in languages whose presence on the web
> is limited;
>
> Is there anything to add? I don’t think so.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Tijani BEN JEMAA
> Executive Director
> Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations
> Phone : + 216 70 825 231
> Mobile : + 216 98 330 114
> Fax : + 216 70 825 231
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> De : owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx] De la part de Andrew Mack
> Envoyé : mardi 5 avril 2011 04:05
> À : Carlton Samuels; Cintra Sooknanan; soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> Objet : [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] IDN proposal language
>
> All,
>
> Apologies for the late sending of this, but Cintra, Carlton and I have been
> working until late to come up with some language for your consideration.
>
> Some of the details obviously are still to be added, but this is the gist of
> our thinking for discussion on tomorrow's call in keeping with our work so
> far.
>
> Cheers, Andrew
>
>
>
>
>
> Andrew A. Mack
> Principal
> AMGlobal Consulting
>
> +1-202-642-6429 amack@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> 2001 Massachusetts Avenue, NW First Floor
> Washington, DC 20036
> www.amglobal.com
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|