Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] call today and summary for the Board

[Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hello,

just for remind, the main objective remain the final report which will be
sent to our chartering organizations. let's focus on the substantive part of
our work, we need to reach consensus soon for part like criteria while we
need also to continue working in the rest of requested tasks , I don't mean
to rush but we need to work to find compromise, I would like to ask
everybody to do his/her best for that. we are working  to respond to
community request.

Regards

Rafik

2011/4/13 Alex Gakuru <gakuru@xxxxxxxxx>

>
> Thank you Olivier,
>
> Further, today's call chat log would be helpful in evaluating WG
> members concerns over the (no) notice and conveyance process. I remain
> of the view that the Board's request be posted on list.
>
> Co-chairs may wish to decide at the earliest on our next call's time
> allocation to help us block the time.
>
> Regards,
>
> Alex
>
> On 4/12/11, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hello Avri,
> >
> > On 12/04/2011 18:32, Avri Doria wrote :
> >>
> >> On 12 Apr 2011, at 18:27, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond wrote:
> >>
> >>> Please be so kind to explain how this working group got to be asked to
> >>> provide a summary of work to the Board by Friday.
> >>> Many thanks,
> >>
> >> Is it a problem to be asked?
> >>
> >> a.
> >>
> >
> > It depends how - and with what deadlines. In business school I was
> > always told about the conflict between writing progress reports on the
> > work, and doing the actual work. So as far as progress report is
> > concerned, if there is indeed a formal request from the Board, I'd
> > suggest a bullet point list with progress marked as "completed", "in
> > progress", "remaining" and "unknown" (or something along those lines).
> > Something swift.
> >
> > Then, there's also a process to be used for asking reports etc. The JAS
> > working group has two Co-Chairs, Rafik & Carlton and if the group was to
> > be asked to produce a progress report, then this request should have
> > been received by Rafik & Carlton. Has it?
> >
> > Last, there's a thing as "giving prior notice". IMHO, since I've first
> > heard of this today, three days prior notice is unreasonable to ask of
> > volunteers.
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > Olivier
> >
> > --
> > Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
> > http://www.gih.com/ocl.html
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Sent from my mobile device
>
>